Pension and Welfare Plans
Gratuities or Compensation
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3312382 |
|---|---|
| Authors | A Norman Somers (National Heritage Board), Louis B Schwartz, Louis Schwartz |
| Year | 1950 |
| Volume | 4 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 77 |
| Publication date | 1950-10-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Industrial and Labor Relations Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0019-7939 • E-ISSN: 2162-271X |
| Publisher | JSTOR (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/2519323 |
| OpenAlex | W4248312091, W2094670780 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
The denial of certiorari by the United States Supreme Court in the Inland Steel Company case was the final step in litigation which established pension and welfare plans as a bargainable issue under the National Labor Relations Act. The decision, however, has not eliminated from the minds of many persons the question of the character of these plans as gratuities or compensation to the employees. This article traces the views concerning the character of such plans, particularly of the courts and administrative agencies. (Author's abstract courtesy EBSCO.)
Actuarial science · Business · Compensation (psychology) · Economics · Labour economics · Market economy · Pension · Political science · Welfare · Workers' compensation · Finance · Labor Movements and Unions · Law · Psychology · Retirement, Disability, and Employment · Social Policy and Reform Studies · Social Psychology
| Citations per year | 0.33 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2023 - 2023 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |