Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Modifiable Futures

Science Fiction at the Bench

Bibliographic Data

ID3323313
AuthorsColin Milburn (0000-0002-6019-3284, University of California, Davis, corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume101
Issue3
Pages560-569
Publication date2010-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueIsis (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0021-1753 • E-ISSN: 1545-6994
PublisherUniversity of Chicago Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1086/655793
PMID21077553
OpenAlexW1973832644
LanguageEN
Citations received17
References cited9

Science fiction remains an alien dimension of the history of science. Historical and literary studies of science have become increasingly attentive to various "literary technologies" in scientific practice, the metaphorical features of scientific discourse, and the impact of popular science writing on the social development of scientific knowledge. But the function of science fiction and even literature as such in the history of scientific and technological innovation has often been obscured, misconstrued, or repudiated owing to conventional notions of authorship, influence, and the organic unity of texts. The better to address those close encounters where scientific practice makes use of speculative fiction, this essay proposes that we instead analyze such exchanges as processes of appropriation, remixing, and modification

Appropriation · Art · Dimension (graph theory · Epistemology · Function (biology · Futures contract · Literature · Social science · Sociology · Sociology of scientific knowledge · Digital Humanities and Scholarship · Philosophy · Radio, Podcasts, and Digital Media · Science Education and Perceptions

  • Respawn

    Open Access•Colin Milburn•Respawn•2018

  • Respawn

    Open Access•Colin Milburn•Respawn•2018

  • Chapitre 2. Sociologie, science-fiction, et après ? Éthique des sciences sociales et crise de la modernité

    Marceau Forêt•Journal international de…•2025

  • Reimagining learning futures through lenses of speculative fiction, scholarly analysis, and public dialogue

    Nicole Oster, P Mishra•Learning Media and Technology•2026

  • Science Fiction as Critique of Science

    Open Access•Brittany Anne Chozinski•Bulletin of Science Technology &…•2016

  • Dream of an Unfettered Electrical Future

    Jennifer L Lieberman, Ronald R Kline•Configurations•2017

  • Greener on the Other Side

    Colin Milburn•Configurations•2012

  • ET Might Not Look Like Us, But ET Will Act Like Us

    Kathleen Bryson•Journal of Posthuman Studies•2024

  • What AI researchers read

    Open Access•Dillon, Sarah Dillon et al.•Interdisciplinary Science Reviews•2022

  • Sci-fi Capital and Humanoid Robotics

    Open Access•Ana Alacovska•Sociology•2025

  • Futures literacy through narrative

    Open Access•Genevieve Liveley, Will Slocombe et al.•Futures•2021

  • Les réalismes de l’anneau-monde

    Open Access•Julien Wacquez•Socio•2019

  • Welcome to the real world

    Open Access•Julien Wacquez•Socio•2019

  • Precog visions

    Open Access•Mehitabel Glenhaber, Hamsini Sridharan•Social Studies of Science•2024

  • The impact of “artificial wool” on the New Zealand wool industry

    Open Access•Rob J F Burton, Hugh Campbell•Journal of Rural Studies•2025

  • Automation, Biocrats, and Imaginaries in Biometric Border Worlds

    Zachary Whyte•Ethnos•2020

  • Conversations in Isis about the Usefulness of Metaphors

    Robert Fyke•Isis•2024

  • Two Bits

    Christopher Kelty, Christopher M Kelty et al.•Two Bits•2008

  • How We Became Posthuman

    N Katherine Hayles•How We Became Posthuman•1999

  • Darwin's Plots

    Open Access•Gillian Beer•Darwin's Plots•2000

  • The two cultures, or the end of the world as we know it

    Roger Luckhurst•Interdisciplinary Science Reviews•2007

  • The Rise of Membrane Technology

    Open Access•Harro Van Lente, Arie Rip•Social Studies of Science•1998

  • Postdisciplinary Liaisons

    Mario Biagioli, Biagioli et al.•Critical Inquiry•2009

  • The Model System of Contemporary Literary Criticism

    Mary Poovey•Critical Inquiry•2001

Unique citing works17
Citations per year1,21
Citation span2012 - 2026 (15)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 17

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae