Taxonomy Construction and the Normative Turn in Religious Studies

Bibliographic Data

ID3335868
AuthorsTravis Warren Cooper (Indiana University Bloomington, corresponding author), Travis Cooper
Year2017
Volume8
Issue12
Pages270
Publication date2017-12-13
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueReligions (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444
PublisherMDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT)
DOI10.3390/rel8120270
OpenAlexW2772754226
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited15

Jonathan Z. Smith contends that a taxonomic agenda underlies the study of religion. Before Smith, structuralist scholars saw it as their task to uncover the roots of human taxonomic arrangements that present themselves as natural. Drawing somewhat anachronistically on Smith's taxonomic model, I argue that underlying investigative categories posed by structural anthropologists are operative strategies of subjective value and valuation. I employ Smith to amend structuralist classificatory paradigms and to speak to questions of normativity, values, and concealed agendas in the contemporary study of religion. Smith's comparative program serves as a fertile territory of encounter between divergent religious studies subfields. In short, I argue that although the normative turn in religious studies has generally succeeded in deconstructing appeals to scholarly objectivity, it faces challenges along other parameters

Biology · Epistemology · Normative · Sociology · Anthropological Studies and Insights · History · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions · Study and Philosophy of Religion · Ecology

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access