Validation of the Interreligious Forms of the Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRSi-7, CRSi-14, and CRSi-20)
Salience of Religion among Selected Youth in the Philippines
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3356768 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Fides Del Castillo (0000-0002-2368-7031, De La Salle University, corresponding author), Clarence Darro Del Castillo (0000-0001-8271-9462, Administration Office, Lumina Foundation for Integral Human Development, Calamba City 4027, Philippines), Marie Antoinette Aliño (St. Paul University Quezon City), Rene Nob (0000-0001-9648-8140, De La Salle University), Michael Ackert (0000-0003-0414-7571, University of Fribourg), Gregory S Ching (0000-0001-9148-0019, Fu Jen Catholic University) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 11 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | 641 |
| Publication date | 2020-11-30 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religions (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/rel11120641 |
| OpenAlex | W3109183152 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 23 |
| References cited | 26 |
The presence of different religions and the freedom of people to navigate the religious space shows that religion in the Philippines is not a monolithic entity. This study validated three versions of the Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRSi-7, -14, and -20) which propose an adequate assessment tool for the diversity of religious belief systems co-existing in Philippine society. The sample (N = 514) was drawn from the young population of the country in an online survey. Descriptive statistics and Cronbach's alpha values were calculated for the five subscales (ideology, intellect, experience, private and public practice) of the Centrality of Religiosity Scale. The factor structure of the interreligious Centrality of Religiosity Scale was tested using confirmatory factor analysis. The results show that CRSi-7 denotes internal consistency while CRSi-14 and CRSi-20 indicate good internal consistency. Models of CRSi-7, -14, and -20 show a good global fit. Despite two models of the CRSi-20 being identical in fit, the researchers defer to the CRSi-20 model with correlated factors since it is a simpler model. All versions of the CRSi demonstrate a valid and reliable measure for the centrality of religiosity in the Philippines and support the usefulness of the CRS for the study of religiosity
Centrality · Confirmatory factor analysis · Cronbach's alpha · Developmental psychology · Geography · Political science · Psychometrics · Religiosity · Statistics · Structural equation modeling · Cultural Differences and Values · Psychology · Religion and Society Interactions · Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology · Social Psychology
Mere religiosity is not enough! Spirituality strengthens the relations between religiosity and positive youth development
Thank you God
Religiosity, Theism, Perceived Social Support, Resilience, and Well-Being of University Undergraduate Students in Singapore during the Covid-19 Pandemic
Footprints of the faith among Filipino youth
Pakikipagkapwa-tao as a mode of inter-religious dialogue in the contemporary Philippines during the Covid-19 pandemic
Perspectives of Youth on Religious Education in the Philippines
Religiosity and LGBTQ+ Affirmative Practice Among Filipino Mental Health Professionals
Spirituality, Religiosity, Caring Behavior, Spiritual Care, and Personalized Care Among Student Nurses
Validation of the Centrality of Religiosity Scale for the Portuguese Population
Dungaw
Anxiety and well-being amidst the Covid-19 outbreak and the moderating role of locus-of-hope
Prime and punishment
Private Religious Practices and Life Satisfaction among Filipino Catholics
Validation of the Polish Version of the Brief Measure of Perceived Divine Engagement and Disengagement in Response to Prayer (PDED)
Faith in Action
Centrality of Buddhist Religiosity Scale
Associations between Prayer and Mental Health among Christian Youth in the Philippines
Validation of the Interreligious Forms of the Centrality of Religiosity Scale in Taiwan
Religiosity among Indigenous Peoples
Pakikipagkapwa (Fellowship)
Centrality of Religiosity among Select LGBTQs in the Philippines
Validation of the Abrahamic Forms of the Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS-5, CRS-10, and CRS-15)
Religiosity and Contentment among Teachers in the Philippines during Covid-19 Pandemic
The many methods of religious coping
Measures of multivariate skewness and kurtosis with applications
Religion, Spirituality, and Health
The Adolescent Religious Coping Questionnaire. Translation and Cultural Adaptation of Pargament’s RCOPE Scale for Polish Adolescents
Covid-19, mental health and religion
And all your problems are gone
Group-based mindfulness-informed psychological first aid after Typhoon Haiyan
Processes of Religious and Spiritual Influence in Adolescence
Stability and change in adolescent spirituality/religiosity
Chinese Buddhism and ethnic identity in Catholic Philippines
Half Mandir and Half Gurdwara”
Perspectives on Faith and Culture in the Philippines, East Timor, and Indonesia
How to Measure Baha'i Religiosity
Religious Coping of Selected Filipino Catholic Youth
Emerging Transitions in the Meaning of Religious Constructs
Filipino College Students' Attitudes towards Religion
The Psychometric Properties of a Romanian Version of the Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS 15)
Brazilian Validation of Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS-10BR and CRS-5BR)
Validation of the Chinese Version of the Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS)
The Centrality of Religiosity Scale (CRS)
Religion in the Age of Social Distancing
| Unique citing works | 23 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4,6 |
| Citation span | 2021 - 2026 (6) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 23 |