Grievance Arbitration
"Not the Venue for Health and Safety Appeals Comment on Mark Harcourt and Sondra Harcourt, "When Can an Employee Refuse Unsafe Work and Expect to Be Protected from Discipline? Evidence from Canada
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3367240 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Winston Gereluk (Athabasca University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2001 |
| Volume | 54 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 882-886 |
| Publication date | 2001-07-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Industrial and Labor Relations Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0019-7939 • E-ISSN: 2162-271X |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/001979390105400408 |
| OpenAlex | W2060052563 |
| Language | EN |
In their July 2000 Industrial and Labor Relations Review article,' Mark Harcourt and Sondra Harcourt make an important contribution to the discussion of the seldom-accessed right of workers in Canada to refuse dangerous work. It is particularly helpful that they referred to actual cases to establish the hypothesis that arbitrators and labor boards tend to favor the employer's right to manage over an employee's right to refuse. Such painstaking analysis is always welcome regarding a matter about which so much misunderstanding exists. Unfortunately, like reports from so many closely delimited studies, this one fails to refer to key information that would have
Arbitration · Business · Grievance · Labor relations · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Work (physics) · Engineering · Law · Occupational Health and Safety Research · Psychology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|