Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cohesion of British Parliamentary Parties

Bibliographic Data

ID3369388
AuthorsLeon D Epstein (University of Wisconsin–Madison, corresponding author)
Year1956
Volume50
Issue2
Pages360-377
Publication date1956-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1951674
OpenAlexW2112406185
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited7

In the perspective of those political scientists who would reform American parties so as to make them more "responsible," British parties are familiar prototypes. Prominent among the admired qualities is the cohesion displayed in parliamentary voting by the members of each major British party. That this cohesion is greater than that of American legislative parties has been generally observed at least since the work of A. Lawrence Lowell. And it is common enough, though not universal, to regard British parliamentary solidarity as a virtue particularly because it permits a victorious party, after an election, to enact the program behind which a majority of voters have presumably been rallied. Correspondingly, the relatively low cohesion among Republican and among Democratic congressmen is taken as a defect of American politics.The purpose of this article, however, is not primarily to discuss value judgments concerning parliamentary cohesion. Rather it is to examine the nature of that cohesion and the ways in which it is maintained. But regardless of the disputed merits of British practice, it is still reasonable to ask after such an examination whether the cohesion of party members in the House of Commons is the product of devices which the United States could adopt, or whether it is the result of underlying factors alien to the American environment

Cohesion (chemistry · Democracy · House of Commons · Legislature · Parliament · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Solidarity · American Constitutional Law and Politics · Law · Public Administration

  • Party Cohesion and Fractionalization in New African Democracies

    Open Access•Peter Vondoepp•Studies in Comparative…•2005

  • Britain and the H-bomb, 1955–1958

    Open Access•Leon D Epstein•The Review of Politics•1959

  • The British Constitution and the Structure of the Labour Party

    Open Access•Gerhard Loewenberg•American Political Science Review•1958

  • The Importance of Winning Big

    Open Access•Robert E Goodin•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1977

  • Consensus and Structure in Legislative Norms

    Edward Crowe, Edward W Crowe•The Journal of Politics•1983

  • Local roots and rebellion

    Open Access•Christin Reuter, Klaus Stolz•Parliamentary Affairs•2025

  • The Constitutionalisation of Party Unity

    Csaba Nikolenyi, Shaul R Shenhav et al.•Journal of Legislative Studies•2015

  • The Development of a Party-Orientated Electorate in England, 1832–1918

    Open Access•Gary W Cox•British Journal of Political…•1986

  • Explaining Party Cohesion in Congress

    Open Access•Helmut Norpoth•American Political Science Review•1976

  • Policy Differences in British Parliamentary Parties

    Open Access•Allan Kornberg, Robert C Frasure•American Political Science Review•1971

  • Toward A More Responsible Two-Party System

    Open Access•Evron M Kirkpatrick•American Political Science Review•1971

  • British political parties

    Robert Mckenzie•British political parties•1967

  • Government and Parliament

    J R Mallory, Herbert Morrison et al.•International Journal Canada s…•1955

  • Can Parliament Survive

    David Thomson•International Affairs•1950

  • The British General Election of 1950

    Carl F Brand•South Atlantic Quarterly•1951

  • British Mass Parties in Comparison with American Parties

    Open Access•Leon D Epstein•Political Science Quarterly•1956

  • The British General Election of 1951

    Open Access•H G Nicholas•American Political Science Review•1952

  • Responsiveness, Responsibility, and Majority Rule

    Open Access•J Roland Pennock•American Political Science Review•1952

Unique citing works11
Citations per year0,16
Citation span1958 - 2025 (68)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 11

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae