"Tom Brown's Schooldays and the Development of "Muscular Christianity
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3374473 |
|---|---|
| Authors | William E Winn (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1960 |
| Volume | 29 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 64-73 |
| Publication date | 1960-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Church History (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0009-6407 • E-ISSN: 1755-2613 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.2307/3161617 |
| OpenAlex | W2164179308 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 2 |
The Broad Church movement, of which "muscular Christianity" was one of the most influential expressions, represented a type of liberalism within the Church of England. Benjamin Jowett claimed that the name "Broad Church" was first proposed in his hearing by Arthur Hugh Clough and that it had become a familiar term in circles at Oxford a few years before 1850. In July 1850, A. P. Stanley, writing on the Gorham controversy in the Edinburgh Review, said that the Church of England was "by the very conditions of its being, not High or Low, but Broad." The term "Broad Church", however only began to be used generally from October 1853, when an unsigned article by W. J. Conybeare, entitled "Church Parties," appeared, also in the Edinburgh Review. F. D. Maurice believed that Conybeare invented the name
Art · Christianity · Literature · Theology · Classics · History · Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies · Philosophy · Scottish History and National Identity
The Court as Classroom
Parrhesia and the ethics of public service – towards a genealogy of the bureaucrat as frank counsellor
Charles Kingsley at Cambridge
The opposite of losses
Reviving “Muscular Christianity”
Manhood and Mary Baker Eddy
A liberalism gone wrong? Muscular liberalism and the quest for monocultural difference
| Citations per year | 0.14 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 1975 - 2026 (52) |
| Highly cited | No |