Personal Jesus

This essay argues that contemporary conceptions of "calling" do not properly reckon with the concept's biblical and historical foundations. In popular culture, where celebrities and social media influencers wield power, religious language is often extracted from faith traditions without regard for the tradition's identity or communal nature. Calling, in this manner, has become a cultural catch-phrase devoid of vocational meaning. For many young, American Christians, including those taught by the authors, calling primarily bears a psychosocial meaning: calling signifies personal or economic fulfillment. Even students who are zealous for their faith tend to read the concept of "calling" within cultural norms rather than the biblical narratives or the Christian tradition's theological insights. The authors present the biblical examples of Moses and Saul (or Paul) to critique contemporary cultural assumptions about calling. They argue that calling is and ought to be a process that is thoroughly dialogical (with God and community), embraces challenges rather than seeking personal stability, and foregrounds the simple act of following Christ's call and example in daily life

Aesthetics · Creed · Dialogical self · Epistemology · Faith · Linguistics · Narrative · Sociology · Theology · Media, Religion, Digital Communication · Philosophy · Religion, Society, and Development · Religion, Spirituality, and Psychology