Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Magic of Concepts

History and the Economic in Twentieth-Century China

Bibliographic Data

ID3393019
AuthorsJulian B Gewirtz (University of Oxford), Julian Gewirtz (University of Oxford, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume48
Issue4
Pages587-589
Publication date2018-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe Journal of Interdisciplinary History (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-1953 • E-ISSN: 1530-9169
PublisherMIT Press - Journals (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1162/jinh_r_01226
OpenAlexW2792450331
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited1

Karl’s The Magic of Concepts is primarily a conceptual intervention in the historiography of modern China. Karl seeks to reframe scholarly understandings of capitalism and globalization in the twentieth-century Chinese context. She focuses in particular on two important periods that in her view witnessed repetitions of similar thematic debates about economic concepts and practices—the 1930s and the 1980s to 1990s. The guiding spirit in this study is the translator and theorist Wang Yanan (1901–1969), from whose work Karl derives the concept of a problematic “magical” approach to economics in China (and, indeed, around the world)—an approach that decontextualizes and dehistoricizes economic ideas and practices in the periods both before and after the “socialist moment” of the first thirty years of the People’s Republic of China (5–6).1Karl’s research design is intensively interdisciplinary. She draws substantially from critical theory, sociology, anthropology, film studies, literary criticism, and heterodox economics in order to describe and critique the “magical thinking” surrounding economic ideas, especially as regards so-called “market fetishism” (160). This book can be seen as a work of historiography or, rather, of “think[ing] about larger historical problematics” not narrowly confined to “the disciplinarity of history” (164). Karl writes, “[T]he ‘magic of concepts’ is at one and the same time a condemnation of a lack of historical-conceptual reflexivity as well as a potentially generative call for an engagement with the conceptual complexity of history as lived global and local experience and social practice” (12). Her overarching aim is to urge scholars to reintegrate their study of economic and philosophical ideas into everyday life in China, rather than detaching these concepts from the human and material contexts in which Karl sees them to have operated.The book’s introduction, “Repetition and Magic,” presents Karl’s case: “The economic” in China must be understood as “embedded within and produced through the broad historical conditions informing and forcing appropriative activity,” especially as pertains to “the production of the everyday and its conceptualization as an uneven yet simultaneous form of modern global social life within the abstracting processes of capitalist expansion and reproduction in different local parts of the globe simultaneously” (11). Five thematically interrelated chapters follow: “The Economic, China, World History: A Critique of Pure Ideology”; “The Economic and the State: The Asiatic Mode of Production”; “The Economic and Transhistory: Temporality, the Market, and the Austrian School”; “The Economic as Lived Experience: Semicolonialism and China”; and “The Economic as Culture and the Culture of the Economic: Filming Shanghai.”The book concludes with an afterword that warns about what Karl contends are the dangers of “the growth over the past decades of a pervasive naturalized (purportedly apolitical) culturalism in politics, history, and social life” as a feature of the post–Cold War world (163). The book’s notes and index are both more than serviceable, and its bibliography provides a wide-ranging syllabus that further underscores Karl’s interdisciplinary approach while reflecting the contributions of the other scholarly works with which Karl engages.2This book will be primarily of interest to graduate students and scholars of modern Chinese history; Karl’s investigations do not make for easy reading. Even so, her contribution with this book is to present a flexible theorization of China’s historical entanglement with economic globalization that will remain relevant because, as she writes in reference to Wang Yanan’s views, “Global capitalism could not be understood without China; China could not be understood without global capitalism” (15)

Capitalism · China · Epistemology · Globalization · Historiography · MAGIC (telescope) · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Chinese history and philosophy · Culture, Economy, and Development Studies · Historical Economic and Social Studies · Law · Philosophy

  • Reforming Bodies and Minds

    Brian Tsui•positions asia critique•2020

  • Agrarian and Mercantile Ideologies in Western Han

    Open Access•Roel Sterckx•Journal of the Economic and…•2020

  • Markets in China and Europe on the Eve of the Industrial Revolution

    Carol H Shiue, Wolfgang Keller•American Economic Review•2007

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2020 - 2020 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae