Mark's Endings in Context
Paratexts and Codicological Remarks
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3404790 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Mel Monier (0000-0002-2182-3861, SIB Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 13 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 548 |
| Publication date | 2022-06-14 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religions (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/rel13060548 |
| OpenAlex | W4282976180 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 20 |
This article addresses the problem of the perception of Mark's endings as expressed in its manuscript tradition. I will argue that, unlike the modern standardized image, manuscript evidence offers a complex phenomenon in which the endings were perceived in diverse ways that move across the threshold that separates a text from paratexts. Further, the manuscripts show an influence between the endings and their associated paratexts. I will show this phenomenon by examining (i) the hypotheses before the Gospel, (ii) marginalia that engaged Mark 16, and (iii) postscripts after the Gospel. In conclusion, the article recommends revisiting the standard perception of the "endings" within their larger paratextual ecosystem
Archaeology · Art · Epistemology · Gospel · Literature · Marginalia · Perception · Phenomenon · Byzantine Studies and History · Historical and Linguistic Studies · History · Medieval Literature and History · Philosophy
| Unique citing works | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2024 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 1 |