The Aftermath of Brussels
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3455147 |
|---|---|
| Authors | J M Jackson, John Jackson (0000-0002-4563-2840, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1963 |
| Volume | 44 |
| Issue | 515 |
| Pages | 215-220 |
| Publication date | 1963-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Blackfriars (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1754-2014 • E-ISSN: 2977-0580 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1111/j.1741-2005.1963.tb00909.x |
| OpenAlex | W2030810707 |
| Language | EN |
Now that the negotiations on Britain's application for membership of the European Economic Community have broken down, many people are asking what will happen next. Few are suggesting that the Common Market itself is in danger of disintegration because of the arrogant manner in which General de Gaulle chose to break off the negotiations, with complete disregard for the wishes of France's fellow members. There can be no doubt that France never wanted Britain to join, for the reasons given by General de Gaulle - if really representing the motives for the French action - should have led France to have rejected the idea of British membership at the very outset. The negotiations were, in fact, a farce, and one can only accept the explanation given by Mr Macmillan in his broadcast to the British people: France brought the negotiations to an abrupt end when they appeared in danger of succeeding, not when they looked like breaking down. What France had hoped for, throughout the eighteen months of negotiations, apparendy, was that agreement would prove impossible, and that Britain would be kept out of the Common Market without France having to incur the odium of exercising her veto.France's partners in the Common Market are, no doubt, displeased with the use of the veto, and above all the manner of its exercise. The Common Market will remain, however. The Five may feel that for some time to come, they must assert themselves in the internal discussions of the Common Market. They will show stronger opposition where, as on a number of issues, they do not see eye to eye with France. Far from benefiting the rest of the world, however, this may have serious consequences for countries outside the Common Market
Citation · Commonwealth · Customs union · Economic history · Economics · Free trade · International economics · International trade · Liberalization · Political science · Tariff · Law · Political Systems and Governance
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |