Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

Board Diversity and Corporate Investment Decisions

Evidence from China

Datos Bibliográficos

ID3486833
AutoresFarman Ali (0000-0002-9420-1588, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics), Muhammad Ullah (0000-0001-9919-8210, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, autor de correspondencia), Sk Tarik Ali (0000-0001-7025-7694, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics), Z Yang (0000-0002-1223-0415, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics), Imran Ali (0000-0001-8154-4082, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics)
Año2022
Volumen12
Número2
Fecha de publicación2022-04-01
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessSí
TipoARTICLE
RevistaSAGE Open (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440
EditorialSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/21582440221104089
OpenAlexW4281684527
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas2
Referencias citadas86

We investigate the relation between board diversity and corporate investment decisions. We select four diversity attributes namely, gender, age, tenure, and education diversity to find its impact of corporate investment. Further, we classify these four diversity attributes into surface-level and deep-level diversity to check its impact on investment. Analyzing Chinese non-financial firms over the period of 2003 to 2017, we employ fixed effect regression to test the formulated hypotheses. We deal with the endogeneity concerns and employ several robustness tests. We find that board gender, tenure, and education diversity reduce corporate investment level. Further, we find that gender and age diversity are negatively associated with sensitivity of investment to growth opportunities, while tenure and education diversity are positively related to investment-Q sensitivity. We find that surface-level diversity reduces the sensitivity of investment to growth opportunities, while deep-level diversity positively affects investment-Q sensitivity. Overall, our findings suggest that board's surface-level diversity is associated with inefficient investment policies, while deep-level diversity improve the corporate investment decisions. This study shows that board diversity play a decisive role in corporate investment decisions. Policies should be devised to mitigate the negative role of surface-level diversity. Furthermore, as deep-level diversity improves investment decisions, organizations and policy-makers should encourage it in order to get benefits of a diverse board. Majority of prior studies consider one dimension of diversity, such as gender, to test its impact on investment decisions. This study shows how surface-level diversity attributes (low job related) and deep-level diversity attributes (highly job related) affect board decisions. This study comprehensively analyzes the impact of board diversity on corporate investment decisions in an emerging economy

Behavioral economics · Business · Corporate governance · Demographic economics · Econometrics · Economics · Endogeneity · Gender diversity · Investment Decisions · Political science · Corporate Finance and Governance · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Gender Politics and Representation · Accounting · Finance

  • Corporate Equality and Information Asymmetry

    Open Access•Gerçek Özparlak•SAGE Open•2026

  • Brain-Gain Directors, Board Gender Diversity, and Firm Performance

    Open Access•Shu-Fen Chuah, Char-Lee Lok et al.•SAGE Open•2025

  • Research in Organizational Behavior

    Barry M Staw•Research in Organizational Behavior•1992

  • Over-investment of free cash flow

    Open Access•Scott Richardson, Scott A Richardson•Review of Accounting Studies•2006

  • Do Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Provide Useful Measures of Financing Constraints?

    S N Kaplan, Luigi Zingales•The Quarterly Journal of Economics•1997

  • Financial Constraints Risk

    Toni M Whited, Guojun Wu•Review of Financial Studies•2006

  • Managerial Incentive Problems

    Bengt Holmström•The Review of Economic Studies•1999

  • Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance

    Open Access•M Babajide Wintoki, James S Linck et al.•Journal of Financial Economics•2012

  • Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance

    Open Access•Sheila Simsarian Webber, Lisa M Donahue•Journal of Management•2001

  • Corporate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm Value

    Open Access•David Carter, David A Carter et al.•Financial Review•2003

  • Government intervention and investment efficiency

    Open Access•Shimin Chen, Shi-Min Chen et al.•Journal of Corporate Finance•2011

  • Cultural Diversity's Impact on Interaction Process and Performance

    Warren E Watson, Kundan Kumar et al.•Academy of Management Journal•1993

  • Board diversity, firm risk, and corporate policies

    Open Access•Gennaro Bernile, Vineet Bhagwat et al.•Journal of Financial Economics•2018

  • A General Equilibrium Approach To Monetary Theory

    James Tobin•Journal of money credit and banking•1969

  • CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation

    Open Access•Mara Faccio, Maria-Teresa Marchica et al.•Journal of Corporate Finance•2016

  • Tobin's Marginal q and Average q

    Fumio Hayashi•Econometrica•1982

  • Gender differences in revealed risk taking

    Open Access•Peggy D Dwyer, James H Gilkeson et al.•Economics Letters•2002

  • Theory of the firm

    Open Access•Michael C Jensen, William H Meckling•Journal of Financial Economics•1976

  • Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models

    Open Access•Richard Blundell, Stephen Bond•Journal of Econometrics•1998

  • Work Group Diversity

    Daan Van Knippenberg, Michaéla C Schippers et al.•Annual Review of Psychology•2006

  • Does Board Gender Diversity Influence Financial Performance? Evidence from Spain

    Open Access•Nuria Reguera Alvarado, Nuria Reguera-Alvarado et al.•Journal of Business Ethics•2015

  • Group Enmity and Accord

    Open Access•Judith R Blau•Social Science History•2000

  • Enjoying the Quiet Life? Corporate Governance and Managerial Preferences

    Marianne Bertrand, Sendhil Mullainathan•Journal of Political Economy•2003

  • A Theory of Privatisation

    Maxim Boycko, Andrei Shleifer et al.•The Economic Journal•1996

  • Stability and change in risk-taking propensity across the adult life span

    Open Access•Anika K Josef, David Richter et al.•Journal of Personality and Social…•2016

Obras citantes distintas2
Citas por año2
Intervalo de citas2025 - 2026 (2)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 2
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae