Board Diversity and Corporate Investment Decisions
Evidence from China
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 3486833 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Farman Ali (0000-0002-9420-1588, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics), Muhammad Ullah (0000-0001-9919-8210, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics, autor de correspondencia), Sk Tarik Ali (0000-0001-7025-7694, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics), Z Yang (0000-0002-1223-0415, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics), Imran Ali (0000-0001-8154-4082, Dongbei University of Finance and Economics) |
| Año | 2022 |
| Volumen | 12 |
| Número | 2 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2022-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | SAGE Open (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 2158-2440 • E-ISSN: 2158-2440 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/21582440221104089 |
| OpenAlex | W4281684527 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 2 |
| Referencias citadas | 86 |
We investigate the relation between board diversity and corporate investment decisions. We select four diversity attributes namely, gender, age, tenure, and education diversity to find its impact of corporate investment. Further, we classify these four diversity attributes into surface-level and deep-level diversity to check its impact on investment. Analyzing Chinese non-financial firms over the period of 2003 to 2017, we employ fixed effect regression to test the formulated hypotheses. We deal with the endogeneity concerns and employ several robustness tests. We find that board gender, tenure, and education diversity reduce corporate investment level. Further, we find that gender and age diversity are negatively associated with sensitivity of investment to growth opportunities, while tenure and education diversity are positively related to investment-Q sensitivity. We find that surface-level diversity reduces the sensitivity of investment to growth opportunities, while deep-level diversity positively affects investment-Q sensitivity. Overall, our findings suggest that board's surface-level diversity is associated with inefficient investment policies, while deep-level diversity improve the corporate investment decisions. This study shows that board diversity play a decisive role in corporate investment decisions. Policies should be devised to mitigate the negative role of surface-level diversity. Furthermore, as deep-level diversity improves investment decisions, organizations and policy-makers should encourage it in order to get benefits of a diverse board. Majority of prior studies consider one dimension of diversity, such as gender, to test its impact on investment decisions. This study shows how surface-level diversity attributes (low job related) and deep-level diversity attributes (highly job related) affect board decisions. This study comprehensively analyzes the impact of board diversity on corporate investment decisions in an emerging economy
Behavioral economics · Business · Corporate governance · Demographic economics · Econometrics · Economics · Endogeneity · Gender diversity · Investment Decisions · Political science · Corporate Finance and Governance · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Gender Politics and Representation · Accounting · Finance
Research in Organizational Behavior
Over-investment of free cash flow
Do Investment-Cash Flow Sensitivities Provide Useful Measures of Financing Constraints?
Financial Constraints Risk
Managerial Incentive Problems
Endogeneity and the dynamics of internal corporate governance
Impact of highly and less job-related diversity on work group cohesion and performance
Corporate Governance, Board Diversity, and Firm Value
Government intervention and investment efficiency
Cultural Diversity's Impact on Interaction Process and Performance
Board diversity, firm risk, and corporate policies
A General Equilibrium Approach To Monetary Theory
CEO gender, corporate risk-taking, and the efficiency of capital allocation
Tobin's Marginal q and Average q
Gender differences in revealed risk taking
Theory of the firm
Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models
Work Group Diversity
Does Board Gender Diversity Influence Financial Performance? Evidence from Spain
Group Enmity and Accord
Enjoying the Quiet Life? Corporate Governance and Managerial Preferences
A Theory of Privatisation
Stability and change in risk-taking propensity across the adult life span
| Obras citantes distintas | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 2 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Velocidad de citación | current |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 2 |