State Development, Parity, and International Conflict

Bibliographic Data

ID3500002
AuthorsDouglas M Gibler (0000-0002-2245-8915, University of Alabama, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume111
Issue1
Pages21-38
Publication date2017-02-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0003055416000514
OpenAlexW2590126493
LanguageEN
Citations received12
References cited32

This article explains the empirical connection between dyadic capability differences and international conflict as a consequence of how, when, and where states enter the international system. State capabilities are largely static, and, since states enter the system in geographic clusters, the processes of state maturation affect contiguous and regionally proximate states similarly. This makes dyadic capability differences static as well. The lack of change in capability differences over time suggests that the parity-conflict relationship is largely a product of the factors associated with state system entry. Indeed, as I demonstrate, several different proxies for the conditions of state system entry separately eliminate any statistical relationship between parity and militarized dispute onset, 1816-2001. I also find no relationship between parity and the wars that have occurred during that same time period. These results have a number of implications for the role of power and capabilities in explaining international conflict

International conflict · Parity (physics · Physics · Political science · Politics · State (computer science · Computer Science · International Development and Aid · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Political Conflict and Governance

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub