Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Evaluation of a Presidential Election Game

Bibliographic Data

ID3529228
AuthorsGuillermo Owens (0000-0002-7151-2607, Rice University, corresponding author), Guillermo Owen
Year1975
Volume69
Issue3
Pages947-953
Publication date1975-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1958409
OpenAlexW2053164359
LanguageEN
Citations received33

The Shapley value of the presidential election "game" is approximated by the method of multilinear extensions; the likely error in this approximation is computed by studying the error in the electoral college game. A comparison with the Banzhaf ratio is also given. The several biases inherent in the electoral system are analyzed from a mathematical point of view. It is shown that the system incorporates a strong bias in favor of the larger states, and a small bias in favor of the smallest states

Electoral college · Game theory · Geometry · Mathematical economics · Multilinear map · Point (geometry · Political science · Politics · Presidential election · Presidential system · Pure mathematics · Shapley Value · Statistics · Value (mathematics · Economic theories and models · Game Theory and Applications · Game Theory and Voting Systems · Law · Mathematics

  • The hidden curse of French inter-communal power

    Open Access•Zineb Abidi Perier, Vincent Merlin•Social Choice and Welfare•2025

  • A power index for multistage and multiagent decision systems

    Open Access•Tatsuaki Kuroda•Systems Research and Behavioral…•1993

  • A game theoretic approach to measuring degree of centrality in social networks

    Open Access•B Grofman, Guillermo Owens et al.•Social Networks•1982

  • Who has the power in the EU

    Open Access•Jason Barr, Francesco Passarelli•Mathematical Social Sciences•2009

  • Monotonicity of power in weighted voting games with restricted communication

    Open Access•Stefan Napel, Andreas Nohn et al.•Mathematical Social Sciences•2012

  • Power indices in a discretely proportional representative system with a large number of voters

    Open Access•Shigeo Muto•Mathematical Social Sciences•1983

  • Average weights and power in weighted voting games

    Open Access•Daria Boratyn, Werner Kirsch et al.•Mathematical Social Sciences•2020

  • Testing Penrose Limit Theorem

    Open Access•Zineb Abidi Perier, Vincent Merlin•Mathematical Social Sciences•2025

  • Thinking About the Political Impacts of the Electoral College

    Open Access•B Grofman, L Feld et al.•Public Choice•2005

  • Pivotal states in the Electoral College, 1880 to 2004

    Open Access•John Wright, John R Wright•Public Choice•2009

  • Optimizing group judgmental accuracy in the presence of interdependencies

    Open Access•Lloyd S Shapley, Lloyd Shapley et al.•Public Choice•1984

  • Proportional versus winner-take-all electoral vote allocations

    Open Access•Patrick Hummel•Public Choice•2011

  • Power indices and probabilistic voting assumptions

    Open Access•Dennis Leech•Public Choice•1990

  • Electoral College reform and the distribution of voting power

    Open Access•Douglas H Blair•Public Choice•1979

  • Is the allocation of voting power among EU states fair

    Open Access•Annick Laruelle, Mika Widgrèn•Public Choice•1998

  • Measuring state power in presidential elections

    Open Access•Terrence J Levesque•Public Choice•1984

  • Exploring the effects of national and regional popular vote Interstate compact on a toy symmetric version of the Electoral College

    Open Access•Olivier de Mouzon, Thibault Laurent et al.•Public Choice•2019

  • The Canadian constitutional amending formula

    Open Access•D Marc Kilgour, Terrence J Levesque•Public Choice•1984

  • Homogeneity, independence, and power indices

    Open Access•Philip D Straffin•Public Choice•1977

  • Modeling the effects of changing issue salience in two-party competition

    Open Access•L Feld, Scott L Feld et al.•Public Choice•2014

  • Are Presidential Inversions Inevitable? Comparing Eight Counterfactual Rules for Electing the U.S. President

    Open Access•Jonathan R Cervas, B Grofman•Social Science Quarterly•2019

  • Une analyse de la loi électorale du 29 juin 1820

    Michel Le Breton, Dominique Lepelley•Revue économique•2014

  • The U.S. Electoral College and Spatial Biases in Voter Power

    Barney Warf•Annals of the Association of…•2009

  • The representation of voter groups in the European Parliament

    Open Access•Hannu Nurmi•Electoral Studies•1997

  • The Power of the States in U.S. Presidential Elections

    Open Access•George Rabinowitz, Stuart Elaine Macdonald•American Political Science Review•1986

  • Resource Allocation In a Presidential Campaign

    Larry M Bartels•The Journal of Politics•1985

  • Cultivating Votes in Rural Chile

    Open Access•Juan Ricardo Couyoumdjian, Juan Pablo Couyoumdjian et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2012

  • Bargaining in Committees of Representatives

    Open Access•Annick Laruelle, Federico Valenciano•Journal of Theoretical Politics•2008

  • Empirical analysis of the distribution of a priori voting power

    Open Access•Dennis Leech•European Journal of Political…•1992

  • The Banzhaf Fallacy

    Howard Margolis•American Journal of Political…•1983

  • Spatial Effects on Voting Power in Representative Democracies

    Open Access•Fred M Shelley•Environment and Planning A…•1984

  • Resource Allocations in the 1976 Campaign

    Open Access•Steven J Bram, Steven J Brams•American Political Science Review•1978

  • Political Participation in Latin America

    Open Access•M A Seligson, John A Booth•Latin American Research Review•1976

Unique citing works33
Citations per year0.66
Citation span1976 - 2025 (50)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 33

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae