Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A Critique of "Democratic Administration" and Its Supporting Ideation

Bibliographic Data

ID3571812
AuthorsRobert T Golembiewski (corresponding author)
Year1977
Volume71
Issue4
Pages1488-1507
Publication date1977-12-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.2307/1961491
OpenAlexW4256514467
LanguageEN
Citations received14
References cited25

This paper analyzes Vincent Ostrom's major work, The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration, which he offers as providing paradigmatic direction for public administration and political science. The analysis urges caution as to that theory's status, especially from five analytic perspectives. Basically, attention is directed at the methodology or mode of inquiry associated with Ostrom's grounding of his argument in public choice theory, with special attention to the role of values. The adequacy of major assumptions of Ostrom's argument as descriptions of reality also is evaluated. Moreover, the critical lack of content in several key concepts is established. In addition, the analysis shows how opposite and simultaneous courses of action are implied by the argument. Finally, attention is directed at how Ostrom's argument can lead to unexpected consequences, even some that are opposite those effects Ostrom intends

Action (physics · Argument (complex analysis · Democracy · Economics · Epistemology · Law and economics · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Sociology · Work (physics · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Engineering · Law · Philosophy · Political Science Research and Education · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research

  • The Contributions of Metropolitan Government to the Success of Toronto's Public Transit System

    Open Access•Frances Frisken•Urban Affairs Quarterly•1991

  • Why Bloomington is not in Virginia

    Open Access•Massimo Cervesato•Public Choice•2026

  • Neoclassical politics

    John Dearlove•Review of Political Economy•1989

  • Toward a Definition of Strategic Management for the Public Sector

    Open Access•James E Skok•The American Review of Public…•1989

  • Running Government Like a Business

    Open Access•Richard C Box•The American Review of Public…•1999

  • Some Problems in Doing Political Theory

    Open Access•Vincent Ostrom•American Political Science Review•1977

  • Economists on the State

    Open Access•John Dearlove•IDS Bulletin•1987

  • Agenda Setting, the “Third Wave,” and the Administrative State

    Open Access•Robert F Durant•Administration & Society•1998

  • Remembering Vincent Ostrom

    Open Access•David Lowery•Public Choice•2013

  • Is the New Public Management a Paradigm? Does it Matter

    Open Access•James Iain Gow, Caroline Dufour•International Review of…•2000

  • Public Administration, Public Choice and the Pathos of Reform

    Open Access•Larry L Wade•The Review of Politics•1979

  • Repositioning American Public Administration? Citizen Estrangement, Administrative Reform, and the Disarticulated State

    Open Access•Robert F Durant, Susannah Bruns Ali•Public Administration Review•2012

  • The Complex Web of Urban Governance

    Open Access•Richard C Rich•American Behavioral Scientist•1980

  • Public Choice Theory and Natural Resources

    Open Access•Mark Sproule-Jones, Mark Sproule‐jone et al.•American Political Science Review•1982

  • Groups, leadership and men

    Harold Steere Guetzkow•Groups, leadership and men•1963

  • Intransitivity of preferences.

    Amos Tversky•Psychological Review•1969

  • Social Choice and Individual Values

    Kenneth J Arrow, Eric S Maskin•Social Choice and Individual Values•2017

  • Collective Choice and Social Welfare

    Open Access•Amartya Sen•Collective Choice and Social…•2017

  • A Preface to Democratic Theory, Expanded Edition

    Robert A Dahl•Preface to Democratic Theory•2006

  • Hierarchy in Organizations

    Open Access•Roy E L Watson, Arnold S Tannenbaum et al.•The Canadian Journal of Sociology•1975

  • The Limits of Organizational Change

    Warren J Samuels•Journal of Economic Issues•1973

  • Caveat Emptor

    Open Access•Thomas R Degregori•Administration & Society•1974

  • Public Administration

    Ira Sharkansky•Stanford Law Review•1976

  • The Consolidation of Urban Public Services

    Harry Pachon, Harry P Pachon et al.•Public Administration Review•1977

  • The Intellectual Crisis in American Public Administration.Vincent Ostrom

    Norton E Long•The Journal of Politics•1974

  • Administrative Reorganization

    Charles S Hyneman•The Journal of Politics•1939

  • Approaches to the Understanding of Decentralization

    James W Fesler•The Journal of Politics•1965

  • Citizen Participation

    James A Riedel•Public Administration Review•1972

  • Theories of Government Related to Decentralization and Citizen Participation

    David K Hart•Public Administration Review•1972

  • The Proverbs of Administration

    Herbert A Simon•Public Administration Review•1946

  • Administrative Decentralization and Political Power

    Herbert Kaufman•Public Administration Review•1969

  • Morality in American Politics

    James R Brown•Thought•1952

  • Dogmas of Administrative Reform

    Open Access•Francis W Coker•American Political Science Review•1922

  • Field Theory and Experiment in Social Psychology

    Ronald Lippitt•American Journal of Sociology•1939

Unique citing works14
Citations per year0.29
Citation span1977 - 2026 (50)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 14

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae