Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Toward a Definition of Strategic Management for the Public Sector

Bibliographic Data

ID11674024
AuthorsJames E Skok (Pennsylvania State University, corresponding author)
Year1989
Volume19
Issue2
Pages133-147
Publication date1989-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe American Review of Public Administration (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0275-0740 • E-ISSN: 1552-3357
PublisherSAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1177/027507408901900203
OpenAlexW2152379768
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited13

The literature on strategic management for public policy and administration has developed without adequate theoretical grounding in regard to the nature of competition among public agencies, the arenas within which competition occurs, and the resources used in the competitive interactions. In this article I review relevant literature from business strategy, public policy, and bureaucratic politics to help construct a theoretical paradigm on which to build usable concepts of strategic management for public policy and administration. The author suggests the following vision of public sector strategic management: Agencies compete within a pluralist political universe composed of dynamic public policy subsystems whose members accumulate and use resources to advance the power and policy preferences of their agencies. Competition among public agencies is seen as offensive (pirating) or defensive (turf-protecting) and as intrasubsystem or intersubsystem in nature. The writings of Downs (1967) and Leontiades (1982) are particularly useful in suggesting the development of these concepts. Public policy subsystems are seen as being distributive, redistributive, or regulatory in accordance with the typology developed by Ripley and Franklin (1984) and others. Resources, varying in the degree of liquidity, are seen as growing out of knowledge and political support as suggested by Rourke (1984), Meier (1987), and others. The article concludes that scholars of public policy and administration should concentrate upon further development of empirical concepts to build a usable theory of public sector strategic management

Bureaucracy · Business · Competition (biology · Economic growth · Economics · Economy · New public management · Policy studies · Political science · Politics · Public policy · Public relations · Public sector · Sociology · Typology · Local Government Finance and Decentralization · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research

  • The Size and Scope of Strategic Planning in State Agencies

    Open Access•Paul Miesing, David F Andersen•The American Review of Public…•1991

  • Fiscal Crisis and Expenditure Cuts

    Open Access•Ringa Raudla, James W Douglas et al.•The American Review of Public…•2016

  • Theory of Strategic Action for Public Policy

    Open Access•James E Skok•The American Review of Public…•1990

  • Private-sector experience with strategic management

    Open Access•Arthur A Goldsmith•International Review of…•1997

  • Inside Bureaucracy

    Anthony Downs, Anthony J Downs•1967

  • Agendas, alternatives, and public policies

    John W Kingdon•Agendas, alternatives, and public…•1995

  • The Calculus of Consent

    James M Buchanan, James Buchanan et al.•The calculus of consent•1960

  • Auditing Disputes in Federal Grant Programs

    Fred Doolittle•Public Administration Review•1981

  • American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political Theory

    Open Access•Theodore J Lowi•World Politics•1964

  • Putting a Powerful Tool to Practical Use

    Douglas C Eadie•Public Administration Review•1983

  • Strategic Organization for People-Centered Development

    David C Korten•Public Administration Review•1984

  • Leadership for Cut-Back Management

    Robert D Behn•Public Administration Review•1980

  • Exit and Voice

    Open Access•David Wilsford•Policy Studies Journal•1984

  • A Critique of "Democratic Administration" and Its Supporting Ideation

    Open Access•Robert T Golembiewski•American Political Science Review•1977

  • Presidential Power versus Bureaucratic Intransigence

    Open Access•Ronald Randall•American Political Science Review•1979

Unique citing works4
Citations per year0.11
Citation span1990 - 2016 (27)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 4

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae