Toward a Definition of Strategic Management for the Public Sector
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 11674024 |
|---|---|
| Authors | James E Skok (Pennsylvania State University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1989 |
| Volume | 19 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 133-147 |
| Publication date | 1989-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | The American Review of Public Administration (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0275-0740 • E-ISSN: 1552-3357 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/027507408901900203 |
| OpenAlex | W2152379768 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 4 |
| References cited | 13 |
The literature on strategic management for public policy and administration has developed without adequate theoretical grounding in regard to the nature of competition among public agencies, the arenas within which competition occurs, and the resources used in the competitive interactions. In this article I review relevant literature from business strategy, public policy, and bureaucratic politics to help construct a theoretical paradigm on which to build usable concepts of strategic management for public policy and administration. The author suggests the following vision of public sector strategic management: Agencies compete within a pluralist political universe composed of dynamic public policy subsystems whose members accumulate and use resources to advance the power and policy preferences of their agencies. Competition among public agencies is seen as offensive (pirating) or defensive (turf-protecting) and as intrasubsystem or intersubsystem in nature. The writings of Downs (1967) and Leontiades (1982) are particularly useful in suggesting the development of these concepts. Public policy subsystems are seen as being distributive, redistributive, or regulatory in accordance with the typology developed by Ripley and Franklin (1984) and others. Resources, varying in the degree of liquidity, are seen as growing out of knowledge and political support as suggested by Rourke (1984), Meier (1987), and others. The article concludes that scholars of public policy and administration should concentrate upon further development of empirical concepts to build a usable theory of public sector strategic management
Bureaucracy · Business · Competition (biology · Economic growth · Economics · Economy · New public management · Policy studies · Political science · Politics · Public policy · Public relations · Public sector · Sociology · Typology · Local Government Finance and Decentralization · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research
Inside Bureaucracy
Agendas, alternatives, and public policies
The Calculus of Consent
Auditing Disputes in Federal Grant Programs
American Business, Public Policy, Case-Studies, and Political Theory
Putting a Powerful Tool to Practical Use
Strategic Organization for People-Centered Development
Leadership for Cut-Back Management
Exit and Voice
A Critique of "Democratic Administration" and Its Supporting Ideation
Presidential Power versus Bureaucratic Intransigence
| Unique citing works | 4 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0.11 |
| Citation span | 1990 - 2016 (27) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |