Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Touch of Civilization

Comparing American and Russian Internal Colonization. By Steven Sabol

Bibliographic Data

ID3577985
AuthorsTim Bowman (West Texas A&M University, corresponding author)
Year2017
Volume49
Issue1
Pages104-104
Publication date2017-12-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueWestern Historical Quarterly (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0043-3810 • E-ISSN: 1939-8603
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/whq/whx075
OpenAlexW2747703269
LanguageEN

Steven Sabol’s The Touch of Civilization is a welcome addition to the small but growing number of histories of colonialism in the North American West, perhaps most notably areas that existed as so-called “internal colonies” inside of U.S. borders. Sabol compares internal colonization’s effects on the Sioux and the Kazakhs of the Russian Steppe in order to explain “how and why two nineteenth-century expanding powers colonized two different peoples, yet one is clearly understood and accepted to be an empire (Russia) and the other is not (United States)” (p. 9). Sabol’s comparison ultimately leads to important larger conclusions about the nature of colonization in the nineteenth-century world. Sabol begins by noting that the United States and tsarist Russia colonized the Sioux and Kazakhs, respectively, thus de-essentializing U.S. western expansion. Sabol sets up his discussion with an overarching analysis of Kazakh and Sioux societies, establishing not only their respective complexities but also how oversimplified notions of each group as “imagined communities” complicated the processes of internal colonization. Although Russian expansion into the Kazakh Steppe preceded U.S. expansion into the Great Plains by two centuries, both powers advanced in stages prior to the nineteenth century in search of economic profit, which required, naturally, military security. Sioux and Kazakh efforts to resist such dominance reinforced for nineteenth-century Russians and Americans the conviction that the two groups’ lands must be settled and occupied; subsequently, both nations launched “civilizing missions [that] could elevate the Sioux and Kazakhs sufficiently from their backwardness and barbarism to prevent the seemingly inevitable extinction” (p. 139). Finally, Sabol establishes that colonial relations of dominance existed inside of Russian and U.S. borders, while Kazakhs and Sioux exerted some level of agency against “civilizing” agents of the U.S. and Russian states, which functioned with subtle differences from one another.

Ancient history · Archaeology · Civilization · Colonialism · Colonization · Dominance (genetics) · Economic history · Empire · Ethnology · Genealogy · Geography · Kazakh · Steppe · History · History of Science and Medicine · Philosophy

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae