James Sterba's New Argument from Evil
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3604444 |
|---|---|
| Authors | William Hasker (0000-0002-9892-3633, Huntington University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 21 |
| Publication date | 2020-12-29 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Religions (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 2077-1444 • E-ISSN: 2077-1444 |
| Publisher | MDPI AG (PUBLISHER • IT) |
| DOI | 10.3390/rel12010021 |
| OpenAlex | W3115020927 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 1 |
This article addresses the main argument in James Sterba's book, an argument which claims that the existence of a good God is logically incompatible with the evil in the world. I claim to show that his main premise, MEPRI, is implausible and is not a secure foundation for such an argument
Argument map · Epistemology · Political science · Premise · Teleological argument · Indian and Buddhist Studies · Law · Medicine · Philosophy · Theology and Philosophy of Evil · War, Ethics, and Justification
A Naturalistic Theodicy for Sterba’s Problem of Natural Evil
A New Defence against the Problem of Evil
Limited Intervention and Moral Kindergartens
Creator Theology and Sterba's Argument from Evil
The Argument from Evil, the Argument from Hiddenness, and Supernaturalistic Alternatives to Theism
God, Evil, and Meticulous Providence
In Answer to the Pauline Principle
Human Sovereignty and the Logical Problem of Evil
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2024 (3) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |