St. George and the Dragon - the Self and the Other
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3610069 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Michael Singleton (0000-0002-6065-1521, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 115 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 63-84 |
| Publication date | 2020-01-01 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Anthropos (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0257-9774 |
| Publisher | Nomos Verlag (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.5771/0257-9774-2020-1-63 |
| OpenAlex | W4249609712, W3037963629 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
Letting the St. George of the medieval legend stand for the Self (G) and the Dragon (D) for the Other (human and nonhuman), then a priori their relationship lends itself to three main models: the first, g d, where the Self grabs all and the Other loses everything. A posteriori, taking religion (ligare) properly so-called to be based on obligatory reciprocity, hunter-gatherers, "primitive" agriculturalists, and neoliberal capitalists, respectively, embody a-religious, religious, and irreligious Choices of Society - options still of vital importance for our common future
Art history · Epistemology · Legend · Nothing · Sociology · Anthropology · History · Philosophy · Religion and Society Interactions · Religious Studies and Spiritual Practices · Religious Tourism and Spaces
| Citations per year | 0.25 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2022 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |