Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

The Janus-faced court of naturalisation

Marriage and kinship in naturalisation litigation in South Korea

Datos Bibliográficos

ID3663237
AutoresNora Hui‐jung Kim (0000-0002-9969-5003, University of Mary Washington, autor de correspondencia), Nora Hui-Jung Kim
Año2016
Volumen42
Número9
Páginas1536-1557
Fecha de publicación2016-07-14
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaNew Community (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0047-9586 • E-ISSN: 1469-9451
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/1369183x.2016.1145540
OpenAlexW2285377753
IdiomaEN
Citas recibidas6
Referencias citadas54

Migration scholars have noted the growing role of the courts in expanding migrants’ rights. Drawing from naturalisation litigation in South Korea for case studies, this article investigates the role of the court in determining national membership. Three main findings are presented based upon an analysis of 105 marriage-based and 36 kinship-based litigations filed against the Ministry of Justice in the Seoul Administrative Court. First, the Court adopts a more liberal interpretation of ‘true intention to marry’ than the Ministry, granting citizenship to those who convincingly perform their roles as dutiful wives. Second, the Court plays a more active role in kinship-based than marriage-based naturalisation, challenging the Ministry's too-narrow interpretation of the requirements. Overall, however, the Court shows strong judicial deference to the Ministry and plays a passive role in advocating for the rights of migrants. The Korean case highlights the need to revisit the tendency to view immigration and citizenship as special classes of public laws, over which administrative and legislative bodies of a government can exercise a significant degree of discretion. As citizenship is becoming an important dimension of social stratification, the judicial branch should serve as a check on the executive branch in issuing visas and granting citizenship

Citizenship · Deference · Discretion · Jurisdiction · Kinship · Naturalisation · Political science · Sociology · Gender and Women's Rights · Law · Migration and Labor Dynamics · Migration, Refugees, and Integration

  • Forgotten Refugees and Erased “Multicultural” Subjects

    Nora Hui‐jung Kim•positions asia critique•2023

  • Targetability as Credibility

    Open Access•Angela Y Mcclean•International Migration Review•2026

  • Contending with neo-classical patriarchal bargain

    I Kim, Zoua M Vang•Citizenship Studies•2020

  • Penalizing 'runaway' migrant wives

    Sohoon Yi•Citizenship Studies•2021

  • From a Spouse to a Citizen

    Open Access•Nora Hui‐jung Kim, Nora Hui-Jung Kim et al.•Law & Society Review•2020

  • Creating hierarchies of noncitizens

    Erin Aeran Chung•New Community•2020

  • The Qualities of a Citizen

    Martha Gardner•Qualities of a Citizen•2005

  • The Birthright Lottery

    Open Access•Ayelet Shachar•Birthright Lottery•2009

  • An Ideal Husband? Marriages of Convenience, Moral Gate-keeping and Immigration to the UK

    Helena Wray•European Journal of Migration and…•2006

  • Performing Whiteness

    John Tehranian•The Yale Law Journal•2000

  • Making and Faking Kinship

    Caren Freeman•Making and Faking Kinship•2017

  • Semblances of Sovereignty

    Open Access•Thomas Alexander Aleinikoff•Semblances of Sovereignty•2002

  • Immigration and the Nation-State

    C Joppke•Immigration and the nation-state•1999

  • Migrant Women’s Bodies as Boundary Markers

    P C Lan, Pei‐chia Lan•Signs: Journal of Women in…•2008

  • Women Within the Refugee Construct

    Susan Kneebone•International Journal of Refugee…•2005

  • A proper wife, a proper marriage

    Open Access•Bonjour, Saskia Bonjour et al.•European Journal of Women s Studies•2013

  • Citizenship Projects for Marriage Migrants in South Korea

    M Kim•Social Politics International…•2013

  • Legal Mobilization on the Terrain of the State

    Open Access•L Kawar•Law & Social Inquiry•2011

  • Guardians at the Gate

    Open Access•Leslie C Levin•Law & Social Inquiry•2009

  • Male-Order” Brides

    Open Access•Uma Narayan•Hypatia•1995

  • Immigrant Incorporation in Western Democracies

    Open Access•Gary P Freeman•International Migration Review•2004

  • Citizenship in Austria, Germany, and Switzerland

    Open Access•Claus Hofhansel•International Migration Review•2008

  • Korean Immigration Policy Changes and the Political Liberals' Dilemma

    Open Access•Nora Hui-Jung Kim•International Migration Review•2008

  • Juridical Framings of Immigrants in the United States and France

    Open Access•L Kawar•International Migration Review•2012

  • Continuity and Change

    Peter H Schuck, Theodore Hsien Wang•Stanford Law Review•1992

  • Immigration in Denmark and Norway

    Harald F Moore•Scandinavian Studies•2010

  • Citizenship Tests

    Open Access•Amitai Etzioni•The Political Quarterly•2007

  • Through the European looking glass

    C Joppke•Citizenship Studies•2013

  • Why Liberal States Accept Unwanted Immigration

    Open Access•C Joppke•World Politics•1998

  • Citizenship as Inherited Property

    Open Access•Ayelet Shachar, Ran Hirschl•Political Theory•2007

  • Reining in the Bureaucrats

    Open Access•Jeeyang Rhee Baum•Governance•2007

  • The Constitutional Court of the Republic of Korea

    James M West, Dae-Kyu Yoon•The American Journal of…•1992

  • International marriage and the state in South Korea

    Hye-Kyung Lee, Hye‐kyung Lee•Citizenship Studies•2008

  • What's the big deal? Naturalisation and the politics of desire

    A M Fortier, Anne-Marie Fortier•Citizenship Studies•2013

  • Determining 'truth' at the border

    Sara L Friedman•Citizenship Studies•2010

  • Immigrant Bureaucratic Incorporation

    Open Access•Helen B Marrow•American Sociological Review•2009

  • Citizenship and Punishment

    Open Access•Michael T Light, Michael Massoglia et al.•American Sociological Review•2014

  • Immigration, Law, and Marginalization in a Global Economy

    Open Access•Kitty Calavita•Law & Society Review•1998

  • Deciding WHO Gets in

    Open Access•Janet A Gilboy•Law & Society Review•1991

  • Matters of Control

    Dora Kostakopoulou•New Community•2010

  • Integration Requirements for Integration's Sake? Identifying, Categorising and Comparing Civic Integration Policies

    W Goodman, Sara Wallace Goodman•New Community•2010

  • A Real Marriage? Applying for Marriage Migration to Norway

    Helga Eggebø•New Community•2013

  • Visa Officers as Gatekeepers of a State's Borders

    Vic Satzewich•New Community•2014

  • Court decisions over marriage migration in Finland

    Johanna Leinonen, Saara Pellander•New Community•2014

  • Unhomely Homes

    Irene Gedalof•New Community•2007

  • Law and Identity

    G Schmidt•New Community•2011

  • Rewarding Integration? Citizenship Regulations and the Socio-Cultural Integration of Immigrants in the Netherlands, France and Germany

    Evelyn Ersanilli, Ruud Koopmans•New Community•2010

  • How nation-states respond to immigration and ethnic diversity

    Stephen Castle, Stephen Castles•New Community•1995

  • An Acceptable Marriage

    Open Access•Saara Pellander•Journal of Family Issues•2015

  • Women, Citizenship, and Nationality

    Open Access•Virginia Sapiro•Latin American Politics and Society•1984

  • In the Name of Love

    Open Access•Anne-Marie D''Aoust, Anne-Marie D’aoust et al.•International Political Sociology•2013

  • Global migration and South Korea

    Ann H Kim, Ricarddo Godoy et al.•Ethnic and Racial Studies•2009

Obras citantes distintas6
Citas por año1
Intervalo de citas2020 - 2026 (7)
Velocidad de citacióncurrent
Altamente citadoNo
Tipos de citaNeutras: 6
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae