Prevention as a norm cluster? Mapping China's contestation on atrocity prevention
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 3689691 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Qiaochu Zhang (0000-0003-1187-2464, School of Business and Management, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 100 |
| Fascículo | 1 |
| Páginas | 241-260 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-01-08 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | International Affairs (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0020-5850 • E-ISSN: 1468-2346 |
| Editora | Oxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1093/ia/iiad224 |
| OpenAlex | W4390668963 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 6 |
| Referências citadas | 22 |
This article argues that China's rhetorical support for prevention at the United Nations obscures its underlying contestation of atrocity prevention in both conception and practice. It introduces a novel conceptual framework, coined as the two-level norm cluster of prevention, which includes three conceptually aligned yet distinct parts: operational conflict prevention, direct atrocity prevention and root-cause prevention. Drawing on interviews and policy documents, this article finds that China conflates direct atrocity prevention with operational conflict prevention, with a preference for the agenda of conflict prevention, as seen in China's divergent commitments to preventing armed conflicts and peacetime atrocities. This conflation represents a deliberate political choice rather than a result of misunderstanding or lack of knowledge regarding their distinctions. China also endorses a strong linkage between direct atrocity prevention and development-focused root cause prevention. Despite China's growing assertiveness in shaping liberal norms and the favourable perception of its development-focused approaches among elite groups in host states, the Chinese government hesitates to officially promote the scholarly concept of developmental peace and present it as an alternative to the existing liberal principles. This reluctance reflects China's intention to avoid explicit confrontation with liberal norms and its concerns about the potential failure of norm entrepreneurship
China · Elite · Norm (philosophy) · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Development and Aid · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security
Chinese Peace? An Emergent Norm in African Peace Operations
Rethinking the Structural Prevention of Mass Atrocities
The Rise of China’s Developmental Peace
Two Pillars of China's Global Peace Engagement Strategy
China's Charm Offensive and Peacekeeping
China, Responsibility to Protect, and the Case of Syria
China and Western Aid Norms in the Belt and Road
China's Socialization in the International Human Rights Regime
China in Darfur
Norm antipreneurs and theorising resistance to normative change
The Chinese approach to peacebuilding
China's foreign policy contradictions
China, the UN, and human protection
Rhetorical adaptation, normative resistance and international order-making
The responsibility to prevent
Not as bad as it seems
Conflict Prevention and the Responsibility to Protect
A chronic protection problem
The Idea and Practice of Conflict Prevention
Democratization and civil war
How Africa and China may shape UN peacekeeping beyond the liberal international order
Does Foreign Development Aid Trigger Ethnic War in Developing States
| Obras citantes distintas | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 3 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 6 |