Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Bain & Political Capital in the 2012 GOP Primary Debates

Bibliographic Data

ID3755692
AuthorsTyler Borchers (0000-0002-0186-6661, Ohio University), Jerry L Miller (0000-0001-7416-4049, Ohio University)
Year2014
Volume58
Issue4
Pages574-590
Publication date2014-04-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0002764213506218
OpenAlexW2318285031
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited11

Mitt Romney's work at Bain Capital became a centerpiece of the primary campaign in January, 2012. Because its portfolio and practices are so diverse, talking points about Bain were at first unpolished. Such inconsistent and haphazard discussion provided an excellent opportunity to study the refinement of campaign messages to their most politically effective and palatable forms. Furthermore, because private equity is so complex, its net effect is fairly debated-among economists, politicians, and voters alike. Thus, conversations about Bain Capital were often disjointed, allowing politicians a great deal of freedom to frame the issue however they wanted regardless of their opponents' statements. Value appeal strategies of reconstructing, bypassing, counterblocking, overriding, and undermining, as defined by Cook, are central to this study, which examines the Republican primary debates and the deliberations surrounding Bain Capital as a representation of free market enterprise. The goal of the article is to explore the dynamics of politic debates within primary contests in which there are shared common values

Appeal · Capital (architecture) · Economics · Equity (law) · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Portfolio · Representation (politics) · Sociology · Value (mathematics) · Work (physics) · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Engineering · Finance · History · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies · Social Media and Politics

  • Why Debate? Assessing the 2024 Republican Primary Debates in the Wake of Trump’s Return to Power

    Open Access•Robert S Hinck, Edward A Hinck et al.•Communication Studies•2026

  • Polls and Elections

    Open Access•Hyun Jung Yun•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2020

  • Seeing Spots

    William L Benoit•Seeing Spots•1999

  • Functions of the great debates

    William L Benoit, Allison Harthcock•Communication Monographs•1999

  • A meta-analysis of the effects of viewing U.S. presidential debates

    William L Benoit, Glenn J Hansen et al.•Communication Monographs•2003

  • Political Justifications

    Terrence E Cook•The Journal of Politics•1980

  • Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study

    John R Petrocik•American Journal of Political…•1996

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2020 - 2026 (7)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae