Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The Rise and Decline of an Open Collaboration System

How Wikipedia’s Reaction to Popularity Is Causing Its Decline

Bibliographic Data

ID3756446
AuthorsAaron Halfaker (0000-0001-8907-6367, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA), R Stuart Geiger (0000-0001-7215-0532, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA), Jonathan T Morgan (University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA), John Riedl (University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA)
Year2013
Volume57
Issue5
Pages664-688
Publication date2013-05-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0002764212469365
OpenAlexW2036291768
LanguageEN
Citations received35
References cited31

Open collaboration systems, such as Wikipedia, need to maintain a pool of volunteer contributors to remain relevant. Wikipedia was created through a tremendous number of contributions by millions of contributors. However, recent research has shown that the number of active contributors in Wikipedia has been declining steadily for years and suggests that a sharp decline in the retention of newcomers is the cause. This article presents data that show how several changes the Wikipedia community made to manage quality and consistency in the face of a massive growth in participation have ironically crippled the very growth they were designed to manage. Specifically, the restrictiveness of the encyclopedia's primary quality control mechanism and the algorithmic tools used to reject contributions are implicated as key causes of decreased newcomer retention. Furthermore, the community's formal mechanisms for norm articulation are shown to have calcified against changes-especially changes proposed by newer editors

Consistency (knowledge bases) · Encyclopedia · Internet privacy · Norm (philosophy) · Political science · Public relations · Quality (philosophy) · Restrictiveness · Computer Science · Digital Rights Management and Security · Law · Open Source Software Innovations · Wikis in Education and Collaboration

  • Wikimedia research methodologies

    Open Access•Steve Jankowski•AI & Society•2026

  • Are Digital Knowledge Commons Real Commons?

    Open Access•Nicolas Jullien, Karine Roudaut•International Journal of the…•2026

  • Value Sensitive Design for Peer Production Systems

    Open Access•Agnieszka Rychwalska, Magdalena Roszczyńska-Kurasińska•IEEE Technology and Society…•2017

  • Communication networks do not predict success in attempts at peer production

    Open Access•Jeremy Foote, Aaron Shaw et al.•Journal of Computer-Mediated…•2023

  • Social Media and Democracy

    Open Access•Arye L Hillman, Ronen Gradwohl et al.•Social Media and Democracy•2020

  • Misinformation, Disinformation, and Online Propaganda

    Open Access•Allison M Gue, Benjamin Lyons•Social Media and Democracy•2020

  • Social Media, Echo Chambers, and Political Polarization

    Open Access•Pablo Barberá Aresté, Pablo Barberá•Social Media and Democracy•2020

  • Governable Spaces

    Open Access•N Schneider, Darija Medic•Governable spaces•2023

  • Unpacking determinants of knowledge quality in an online knowledge community

    Jiangnan Qiu, Qian Wang et al.•Information Technology and People•2026

  • Can bots help create knowledge? The effects of bot intervention in open collaboration

    Open Access•Seonjun Kang, Xiaojin Liu et al.•Decision Support Systems•2021

  • From oligarchy to decentralization

    Open Access•Chao Liu•Technological Forecasting and…•2025

  • A Systems Approach to Studying Online Communities

    Open Access•Jeremy Foote•Media and Communication•2022

  • The block log

    Open Access•Ryan Mcgrady•New Media & Society•2025

  • What is a flag for? Social media reporting tools and the vocabulary of complaint

    Open Access•K Crawford, Tarleton Gillespie•New Media & Society•2014

  • Admins, mods, and benevolent dictators for life

    Open Access•N Schneider•New Media & Society•2021

  • Common sense or censorship

    Open Access•Joao Fernando Ferreira Goncalves, Ina Weber et al.•New Media & Society•2021

  • Beyond notification

    Open Access•Harry Ford, Iolanda Pensa et al.•New Media & Society•2018

  • Decoding revision mechanisms in Wikipedia

    Open Access•Xixuan Zhang•New Media & Society•2025

  • Mundane work for utopian ends

    Open Access•Christian Pentzold•New Media & Society•2021

  • Anyone can edit’, not everyone does

    Open Access•Harry Ford, Heather Ford et al.•Social Studies of Science•2017

  • Wikipedia in the anti-Sopa protests as a case study of direct, deliberative democracy in cyberspace

    P Konieczny•Information Communication & Society•2017

  • Mind the skills gap

    Eszter Hargittai, Aaron Shaw•Information Communication & Society•2015

  • Hacking Weber

    Mathieu O’neil, Mathieu O'Neil•Information Communication & Society•2014

  • Wikipedia

    Open Access•Emiel A Rijshouwer, J Uitermark et al.•Information Communication & Society•2023

  • Large-Scale Communication is More Complex and Unpredictable with Automated Bots

    Open Access•M Hilbert, David Darmon•Journal of Communication•2020

  • Where and when AI and CI meet

    Open Access•Stefaan Verhulst•AI & Society•2018

  • Laboratories of Oligarchy? How the Iron Law Extends to Peer Production

    Open Access•Aaron Shaw, Benjamin Mako Hill•Journal of Communication•2014

  • Overcoming Social Barriers When Contributing to Open Source Software Projects

    Open Access•Igor Steinmacher, Marco Aurélio Gerosa et al.•Computer Supported Cooperative…•2019

  • Latent Groups in Online Communities

    Open Access•Arto Lanamäki, Juho Lindman•Computer Supported Cooperative…•2018

  • Why and how medical schools, peer-reviewed journals, and research funders should promote Wikipedia editing

    Gwinyai Masukume•Studies in Higher Education•2020

  • Wp

    Open Access•Amanda Menking, Jon Rosenberg•Science Technology & Human Values•2021

  • Beyond opening up the black box

    Open Access•R Stuart Geiger•Big Data & Society•2017

  • Domination et critique dans les projets collaboratifs sur internet

    Mathieu O’neil•Réseaux•2013

  • The Free Encyclopaedia that Anyone can Edit

    Open Access•Kim Osman•Culture Unbound Journal of…•2014

  • Automated Platform Governance Through Visibility and Scale

    Open Access•Lucas Wright•Social Media + Society•2022

  • Governing the Commons

    Open Access•Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром•Governing the Commons•1990

  • Internet encyclopaedias go head to head

    Open Access•Jim Giles•Nature•2005

  • Governing the Commons

    Open Access•Elinor Ostrom, Элинор Остром•Governing the Commons•2015

  • Socialization in an Open Source Software Community

    Open Access•Nicolas Ducheneaut•Computer Supported Cooperative…•2005

  • The politics of 'platforms

    Open Access•Tarleton Gillespie•New Media & Society•2010

  • Mixing Humans and Nonhumans Together

    Jim Johnson•Social Problems•1988

Unique citing works35
Citations per year2,69
Citation span2013 - 2026 (14)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 32

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae