The Look of Losing, Then and Now
Nixon, Obama, and Nonverbal Indicators of Opportunity Lost
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3757381 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Erik P Bucy (0000-0003-4925-2244, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, TX, USA, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2016 |
| Volume | 60 |
| Issue | 14 |
| Pages | 1772-1798 |
| Publication date | 2016-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0002764216678279 |
| OpenAlex | W2567807715 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
| References cited | 35 |
This article asks whether losing in a political debate is associated with a set of visible, empirically verifiable nonverbal indicators that correspond to physical weakness, pronounced stress, evasive or fearful behavior, and other outward signs of secondary or subordinate status. To answer this question, a comparative content analysis of the first 1960 and 2012 U.S. presidential debates is performed, contrasting the "losing" performance of Richard Nixon during the first televised presidential debate of 1960 with the "lackluster" performance of Barack Obama during the first televised debate of 2012-arguably the worst night of his political career. Campaign lore and anecdotal accounts suggest in Nixon's case that negative evaluations were mostly due to his haggard appearance rather than debate performance, but detailed content analysis using biobehaviorally derived expressive categories suggests the vice president's nonverbal behavior was equally important. For the 2012 debate, particular emphasis is placed on the communicative behavior of President Obama, who appeared evasive and at times dominated by Mitt Romney, which disappointed supporters and gave Romney momentum in the polls. To facilitate comparison, each debate is subjected to a shot-by-shot analysis of the candidates' nonverbal behavior, including facial expressions, vocal tone, communicative gestures, blink rate, and other nonverbal tics
Art · Gesture · Linguistics · Literature · Media studies · Nonverbal communication · Political science · Politics · Presidential system · Set (abstract data type) · Sociology · Tone (literature) · Communication · Communication in Education and Healthcare · Emotions and Moral Behavior · Humor Studies and Applications · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology
Agentic but Not Aggressive
The Political Functions of Smiles by Kamala Harris and Donald J. Trump During the 2024 Presidential Debate
Building an ICCN Multimodal Classifier of Aggressive Political Debate Style
Visual Priming and Framing During the 2020 Democratic Presidential Debates
Follower Expectations Regarding the Functions of Smiles During the 2024 Presidential Election Reflect Political Identity
Since you put it that way… Gender norms and interruptions at Supreme Court oral arguments
Emotional response to U.K. political party leader facial displays of affiliation, reward, and ambiguity during Brexit
Are You Too Busy to Listen Up?” Legislative (Dis)engagement from Constituents in Local Public Meetings
Facing the Electorate
Public Opinion and Emphatic Legislative Speech
Nonverbal Communication in Politics
Gender, Candidate Emotional Expression, and Voter Reactions During Televised Debates
Mass media and political thought
The symbolic uses of politics
In-Your-Face Politics
Presidential Debate Watching, Issue Knowledge, Character Evaluation, and Vote Choice
Winners of the First 1960 Televised Presidential Debate Between Kennedy and Nixon
The Emotional Appropriateness Heuristic
Handbook of Biology and Politics
Taking leaders at face value
Happy warriors” Revisited
When style obscures substance
Nonverbal expectancy violations
Effects of Implicit Power Motivation on Men's and Women's Implicit Learning and Testosterone Changes After Social Victory or Defeat
Television Coverage of Candidates' Display Behavior during the 1984 Democratic Primaries in the United States
Image Bite Politics
Television's portrayal of the 1976 presidential debates
The Power of Television Images
Ordeal by Debate
Political Learning from Presidential Debates
Signs of appeasement
The Power of Television Images in a Social Media Age
The Repertoire of Nonverbal Behavior
Looks That Matter
Dual Screening During Presidential Debates
Effects of Communication Expectancies, Actual Communication, and Expectancy Disconfirmation on Evaluations of Communicators and Their Communication Behavior
Nonverbal Expectancies and the Evaluative Consequences of Violations
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,2 |
| Citation span | 2016 - 2026 (11) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 12 |