Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Political Learning from Presidential Debates

Bibliographic Data

ID6333318
AuthorsThomas M Holbrook (0000-0002-9637-5768, University of Wisconsin–Milwaukee, corresponding author)
Year1999
Volume21
Issue1
Pages67-89
Publication date1999-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenuePolitical Behavior (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0190-9320 • E-ISSN: 1573-6687
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1023/a:1023348513570
OpenAlexW109589384
LanguageEN
Citations received62
References cited32

Context (archaeology · Political science · Politics · Presidential system · Sociology · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Media Influence and Politics · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · History · Law

  • The Personalization of Politics

    I Mcallister•The Oxford Handbook of Political…•2009

  • Presidential Debate Watching, Issue Knowledge, Character Evaluation, and Vote Choice

    Open Access•William L Benoit, Glenn J Hansen•Human Communication Research•2004

  • The Effect of Streaming Chat on Perceptions of Political Debates

    Open Access•Victoria S Asbury-Kimmel, Victoria Asbury-Kimmel et al.•Journal of Communication•2021

  • Analisis Manajemen Impresi Ma'ruf Amin dalam Debat Pilpres 2019

    Open Access•Eunike Iona Saptanti•Ultimacomm•2020

  • Learning from Presidential Debates

    Open Access•Freddie J Jennings, Benjamin R Warner et al.•Communication Studies•2020

  • Why Debate? Assessing the 2024 Republican Primary Debates in the Wake of Trump’s Return to Power

    Open Access•Robert S Hinck, Edward A Hinck et al.•Communication Studies•2026

  • Fostering learning among women

    Freddie J Jennings, Kelsey Wexler et al.•Communication Quarterly•2022

  • Presidential Debate Watching, Issue Knowledge, Character Evaluation, and Vote Choice

    Open Access•William L Benoit, Glenn J Hansen•Human Communication Research•2004

  • “Signature Habits” and “Strict Rules”

    Jennifer Sclafani, Nasiba Norova•Journal of Language and…•2026

  • A Tale of Two Debates

    R L Holbert, Huma Rasheed et al.•Journal of Broadcasting &…•2026

  • Issue and Image Learning in Debates

    Open Access•Steven D Gardiner, Freddie J Jennings et al.•American Behavioral Scientist•2026

  • What do interviewer intelligence ratings actually measure

    Open Access•Matthew Motta•Research & Politics•2016

  • Feasting Our Eyes on the Candidates

    Open Access•Susana Rogeiro Nina, José Santana-Pereira•The International Journal of…•2020

  • Systemic Effects of Televised Candidates' Debates

    Open Access•André Blais, Andrea M L Perrella•The International Journal of…•2008

  • Who Learns in Information Rich Contexts? The Informative Effects of the 2015 Spanish Electoral Campaign

    Open Access•Monica Ferrín, Marta Fraile Maldonado et al.•The International Journal of…•2019

  • Debates and the Disincentives of Democracy

    Jason Turcotte•Journalism Practice•2013

  • Rating the debates

    Open Access•Stewart Davidson, Stephen Elstub et al.•British Politics•2016

  • The News Norms and Values of Presidential Debate Agendas

    Jason Turcotte•Mass Communication & Society•2014

  • Disappeared or deleted? Media coverage of policy content in presidential debates

    Open Access•Jiyoung Park, Sinjae Kang et al.•Japanese Journal of Political…•2025

  • Zanu-PF’s bigwig rallies as performative politics during Zimbabwe’s 2008 and 2013 elections

    Mcdonald Lewanika•Commonwealth and Comparative…•2023

  • Steigert die Rezeption von TV-Duellen das Vertrauen in die Spitzenkandidaten

    Open Access•J Maier, Carolin Jansen•Zeitschrift für Politikwissenschaft•2018

  • TV debates in EP election campaigns – the influence of the 2019 Eurovision debate on voting behaviour

    Open Access•Andreas C Goldberg•Journal of European Public Policy•2022

  • Debating the Debate

    Open Access•Yariv Tsfati•Harvard International Journal of…•2003

  • Emotion and political cognition

    Craig R Hullett, Allan D Louden et al.•Communication Monographs•2003

  • Debunking Nixon’s radio victory in the 1960 election

    Open Access•Jon Bruschke, Laura Divine•The Social Science Journal•2016

  • Polls and Elections

    Open Access•Aaron C Weinschenk•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2017

  • In Through the Out Door

    Open Access•Jared Alan Stewart•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2018

  • Presidential Policy Initiatives

    Open Access•Jason Barabas•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2008

  • Presidential Debates, Partisan Motivations, and Political Interest

    Open Access•Kevin J Mullinix•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2015

  • Political learning during the 2000 U.S. presidential election

    Open Access•Heather L Ondercin, James Garand et al.•Electoral Studies•2011

  • Presidential Campaign Spending and Correct Voting from 2000 to 2008

    Open Access•Matthew L Bergbower, Scott D Mcclurg et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2015

  • This time it’s different? Effects of the Eurovision Debate on young citizens and its consequence for EU democracy – evidence from a quasi-experiment in 24 countries

    J Maier, Thorsten Faas et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2018

  • Be there or be square – The impact of participation and performance in the 2017 Dutch TV debates and its coverage on voting behaviour

    Open Access•Andreas C Goldberg, Carolin Ischen•Electoral Studies•2020

  • Agenda Control in the 2008 Presidential Debates

    Open Access•Amber E Boydstun, Rebecca A Glazier et al.•American Politics Research•2013

  • Cognitive Style and Political Learning in the 2000 U.S. Presidential Campaign

    Open Access•Thomas M Holbrook•Political Research Quarterly•2006

  • Presidential Debates and Electoral Preferences in Weakly Institutionalised Democracies

    Open Access•Francisco Cantú, Miguel Carreras•Journal of Politics in Latin…•2023

  • Deliberative qualities in televised election debates

    Sofie Marien, Ine Goovaerts et al.•West European Politics•2020

  • The Power of Television Images

    James N Druckman•The Journal of Politics•2003

  • Preaching to the Choir? Presidential Debates and Patterns of Persuasion in a Multiparty Presidential System

    Open Access•Richard Lloyd, Ryan Lloyd et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2021

  • Real-Time Reactions to a 2012 Presidential Debate

    Amber E Boydstun, Rebecca A Glazier et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2014

  • Presidential Rhetoric, Candidate Evaluations, and Party Identification

    Open Access•David Doherty•Political Research Quarterly•2008

  • Failing to Recall

    Open Access•Beth Miller•Political Psychology•2013

  • Presidential Campaigns and the Knowledge Gap

    Thomas M Holbrook•Political Communication•2002

  • The Influence of “Social Viewing” on Televised Debate Viewers’ Political Judgment

    Kyu S Hahn, Hye-Yon Lee et al.•Political Communication•2018

  • Campaigns Matter

    Kristine M Hansen, Kasper M Hansen et al.•Political Communication•2014

  • Playing to the Crowd

    Amber E Boydstun, Rebecca A Glazier et al.•Political Communication•2013

  • The Changing Nature of Political Debate Consumption

    Jeffrey A Gottfried, Bruce W Hardy et al.•Political Communication•2017

  • Issue-Related Learning in a Gubernatorial Campaign

    Stephen C Craig, James G Kane et al.•Political Communication•2005

  • Spin (and Pitch) Doctors

    Open Access•Michael I Norton, George R Goethals•Political Behavior•2004

  • The activation of nationalist attitudes

    Open Access•Giorgio Malet•Journal of European Public Policy•2025

  • Electoral Impact of Televised Leaders' Debates on Australian Federal Elections

    Philip Senior•Australian Journal of Political…•2008

  • Valence and spatial explanations for voting in the 2013 Australian election

    I Mcallister, Jill Sheppard et al.•Australian Journal of Political…•2015

  • Reducing the Undervote With Vote by Mail

    Open Access•Andrew Menger, Robert M Stein et al.•American Politics Research•2018

  • Political Knowledge and Exposure to the 2012 US Presidential Debates

    Open Access•Jason Turcotte, Kirby Goidel et al.•PS Political Science & Politics•2014

  • YouTube y los debates electorales entre Dilma Rousseff y Aécio Neves en las elecciones de 2014 para el Presidente de Brasil

    Open Access•Thiago Perez Bernardes De Moraes, Doacir Gonçalves De Quadros•Revista de la Facultad de Derecho…•2019

  • The World Was Watching-And Talking

    Open Access•Khisu Beom, Diana B Carlin et al.•American Behavioral Scientist•2005

  • Presidential and Vice Presidential Debates in 2008

    Open Access•Kate Kenski, Kathleen Hall Jamieson•American Behavioral Scientist•2011

  • Who Watches Presidential Debates? A Comparative Analysis of Presidential Debate Viewing in 2000 and 2004

    Open Access•Kate Kenski, Natalie Jomini Stroud•American Behavioral Scientist•2005

  • Do Presidential Primary Debates Increase Political Polarization

    Open Access•Benjamin R Warner, Jihye Park et al.•American Behavioral Scientist•2024

  • The Look of Losing, Then and Now

    Open Access•Erik P Bucy•American Behavioral Scientist•2016

  • Election 2000, the Presidential Debates, and Nader

    Open Access•Kenneth J Levine•American Behavioral Scientist•2001

  • New media, elections and the political knowledge gap in Australia

    Open Access•R Gibson, Rachel K Gibson et al.•Journal of Sociology•2015

  • The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion

    Open Access•John R Zaller, John Zaller•Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion•1992

  • Presidential Primaries and the Dynamics of Public Choice

    Open Access•Larry M Bartels•Presidential Primaries and the…•1988

  • Do Campaigns Matter?

    Thomas M Holbrook, Thomas Holbrook•Do Campaigns Matter?•1996

  • The Knowledge Gap

    Open Access•Cecilie Gaziano•Communication Research•1983

  • The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory-based or on-line.

    Reid Hastie, B Park•Psychological Review•1986

  • The Reasoning Voter

    Samuel L Popkin•The Reasoning Voter•1991

  • Explorations in Political Psychology

    Open Access•Shanto Iyengar, William James McGuire•Explorations in Political…•1993

  • Information and Elections

    R Michael Alvarez, R Alvarez•Information and elections•1997

  • Media access and knowledge gaps

    George A Donohue, Clarice N Olien et al.•Critical Studies in Mass…•1987

  • Presidential debates—are they helpful to voters

    Steven H Chaffee•Communication Monographs•1978

  • Why Are American Presidential Election Campaign Polls So Variable When Votes Are So Predictable

    Open Access•Andrew Gelman, Gary King•British Journal of Political…•1993

  • "The "Turning Point

    Open Access•David J Lanoue•American Politics Quarterly•1991

  • Information Processing and Partisan Neutrality

    Jay A Desart•The Journal of Politics•1995

  • Reexamining the "Minimal Effects" Model in Recent Presidential Campaigns

    Steven E Finkel•The Journal of Politics•1993

  • One That Made a Difference

    David J Lanoue•Public Opinion Quarterly•1992

  • Information Flow and the Stability of Partisan Attitudes

    Philip E Converse•Public Opinion Quarterly•1962

  • Mass Media Flow and Differential Growth in Knowledge

    Phillip J Tichenor, George A Donohue et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•1970

  • Who Gets the News? Alternative Measures of News Reception and Their Implications for Research

    Vincent Price, John Zaller•Public Opinion Quarterly•1993

  • Bringing Converse Back In

    Open Access•John Zaller•Political Analysis•1989

  • Rationalization and Derivation Processes in Survey Studies of Political Candidate Evaluation

    Wendy M Rahn, Jon A Krosnick et al.•American Journal of Political…•1994

  • Explaining political sophistication

    Open Access•Robert C Luskin•Political Behavior•1990

  • Messages Received

    Open Access•Larry M Bartels•American Political Science Review•1993

  • The Responsive Voter

    Open Access•Milton Lodge, Marco R Steenbergen et al.•American Political Science Review•1995

  • An Impression-Driven Model of Candidate Evaluation

    Open Access•Milton Lodge, Kathleen M Mcgraw et al.•American Political Science Review•1989

Unique citing works62
Citations per year2,48
Citation span2001 - 2026 (26)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 62

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae