Foundations in Canada
A Comparative Perspective
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3757519 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Peter R Elson (University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, corresponding author), Jean-Marc Fontan (0000-0003-0488-7756, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada), Sylvain Lefèvre (Université du Québec à Montréal, Montreal, Québec, Canada), James Stauch (Mount Royal University, Calgary, Alberta, Canada) |
| Year | 2018 |
| Volume | 62 |
| Issue | 13 |
| Pages | 1777-1802 |
| Publication date | 2018-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0002764218775803 |
| OpenAlex | W2804590838 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 10 |
| References cited | 24 |
From a Canadian perspective, this article provides a comparative historical and contemporary overview of foundations in Canada, in relation to the United States and Germany. For the purposes of this analysis, the study was limited to public or private foundations in Canada, as defined by the Income Tax Act. As the Canadian foundation milieu straddles the welfare partnership model that characterizes German civil society and the Anglo-Saxon model of the United States, Canadian foundations as a whole have much in common with the foundation sector in both countries. Similarities include the number of foundations per capita, a similar range in size and influence, a comparable diversity of foundation types, and an explosion in the number of foundations in recent decades (although the United States has a much longer history of large foundations making high-impact interventions). This analysis also highlights some key differences among larger foundations in the three jurisdictions: German foundations are generally more apt to have a change-orientation and are more vigorous in their disbursement of income and assets. U.S. foundations are more likely to play a welfare-replacement role in lieu of inaction by the state. Canadian foundations play a complementary role, particularly in the areas of education and research, health, and social services. At the same time, there is a segment of Canadian foundations that are fostering innovation, social and policy change, and are embarking on meaningful partnerships and acts of reconciliation with Indigenous Peoples in Canada
Diversity (politics) · Economic growth · Economics · General partnership · Geography · German · Political science · Politics · Welfare state · Healthcare innovation and challenges · Law · Public Administration
Full Issue
Walking the Talk on Sustainable Development Goals
De la promesa de los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible a la acción
Remaining Unreconciled
Corporate Foundations' Governance Mechanisms as a Tool for Stakeholder Engagement
Philanthropic Foundations Strategizing Towards Sustainable Development Goals
Zionist Philanthropy and Palestinian Erasure
Hidden treasures
The political economy of accountability
Toward a Comparative Understanding of Foundations
Indigenous peoples and human rights
J.W. McConnell
Rockefeller, Carnegie, and Canada
High Ideals and Noble Intentions
Pour une approche sociopolitique de la philanthropie financière
Knowledge as Leadership, Belonging as Community
The Art and Science of Place-Based Philanthropy
System Change Agents
Size-Based Analysis of Charitable Foundations
The Place of Foundations and Endowments in German History
The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and Legitimacy in Global Health Governance
Philanthropic Foundations in Cross-National Perspective
The Role of Foundations in Public Debates in Germany
| Unique citing works | 10 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,25 |
| Citation span | 2018 - 2026 (9) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |