Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Consecration and Materiality

Bibliographic Data

ID3757953
AuthorsFiona Rose Greenland (University of Virginia, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume65
Issue1
Pages140-158
Publication date2021-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0002764218801063
OpenAlexW2898249470
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited29

This article focuses on a case of failed consecration: the Egyptian obelisk in New York's Central Park, commonly known as Cleopatra's Needle. The obelisk arrived in New York from Alexandria in 1880, with great fanfare. For a brief period, it was the talk of the town: a tourist curiosity and star of advertising campaigns for consumer goods. After an initial surge in public visibility, the monument's prominence faded. Today, the obelisk is not on the list of New York's top cultural attractions, and no longer features in media campaigns or political rallies. I ask why the obelisk's initial popularity failed to crystallize into an enduring condition of consecration. To answer this question, I use archival data to chart the obelisk's transfer of ownership and planned move, through its Central Park début and subsequent decline in cultural salience. The obelisk met key criteria associated with successful cases of retrospective consecration. What weakened the obelisk's career were lack of consecrating institutions and inherently unstable material conditions. These mechanisms are symbiotically related: because no institution took responsibility for conserving and protecting the obelisk, its granite face rapidly deteriorated and frustrated attempts to attract potential consecrating institutions. The article makes a twofold contribution to the literature on retrospective consecration. First, by discussing a failed case, it highlights the linked efficacy of consecration formation mechanisms. Second, in focusing on an ancient monument, it demonstrates the role played by materials and the specific measures of consecration that obtain in the broader sphere of ancient monuments

Archaeology · Consecration · Political science · Sociology · Archaeological Research and Protection · Classical Antiquity Studies · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · History · Law

  • Living with Ghosts

    Open Access•M Patterson, Henry Tsang et al.•American Sociological Review•2026

  • From artistic consecration to degradation

    Open Access•Dominik Želinský, Philip Smith et al.•Acta Sociologica•2022

  • Counterheritage

    D Byrne•Counterheritage•2014

  • Best Laid Plans

    Terence E Mcdonnell•Best Laid Plans•2016

  • Impossible Engineering

    Chandra Mukerji•Impossible Engineering•2009

  • What About Mozart? What About Murder?

    Howard Saul Becker•What about Mozart? What about…•2014

  • Intangible Heritage as Metacultural Production1

    Open Access•Barbara Kirshenblatt-Gimblett•Museum International•2004

  • Negative Heritage

    Trinidad Rico•Conservation and Management of…•2008

  • Global cultural governance. Decision-making concerning world heritage between politics and science

    Open Access•Thomas M Schmitt•Erdkunde•2009

  • The New York Obelisk or How Cleopatra's Needle Came to New York and What Happened When It Got Here

    Martina D'Alton•The Metropolitan Museum of Art…•1993

  • Patina

    Shannon Lee Dawdy, Shannon Dawdy•Patina•2015

  • The Search for God in Ancient Egypt

    Susan Tower Holli, Susan Tower Hollis et al.•Journal of the American Research…•2002

  • TheParthenonMarbles as icons of nationalism in nineteenth-centuryBritain

    Open Access•Fiona Rose‐greenland•Nations and Nationalism•2013

  • Cultural entrepreneurship in nineteenth-century Boston

    Open Access•P Dimaggio•Media Culture & Society•1982

  • The Institutionalization of Fame

    Open Access•Michael Patrick Allen, Michael Allen et al.•American Sociological Review•2006

  • A general theory of artistic legitimation

    Open Access•Sara Baumann, Shyon Baumann•Poetics•2007

  • Unesco and the Fate of the World Heritage Indigenous Peoples Council of Experts (WHIPCOE)

    Open Access•L Meskell•International Journal of Cultural…•2013

  • History and the National Sensorium

    Open Access•Geneviève Zubrzycki•Qualitative Sociology•2011

  • Retrospective Cultural Consecration in Popular Music

    Open Access•Vaughn Schmutz•American Behavioral Scientist•2005

  • The Elementary Forms of Religious Life

    Emile Durkheim, Carol Cosman et al.•The Elementary Forms Of Religious…•2009

  • Critical Discourse and the Cultural Consecration of American Films

    M P Allen, Michael Allen et al.•Social Forces•2004

  • Profane archaeology and the existential dialectics of the city

    Open Access•Shannon Lee Dawdy, Shannon Dawdy•Journal of Social Archaeology•2016

  • Arrested Heritage

    Open Access•Marko Scholze•Journal of Material Culture•2008

  • Color Perception in Sociology

    Open Access•Fiona Rose-Greenland, Fiona Rose‐greenland•Sociological Theory•2016

  • On Comparative Analysis, Interdisciplinarity and Internationalization in Sociology

    Open Access•Neil J Smelser•International Sociology•2003

  • Recognition and Renown

    Gladys Engel Lang, Kurt Lang•American Journal of Sociology•1988

  • Preserving the unpreservable

    Open Access•Fernando Dominguez Rubio•Theory and Society•2014

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2022 - 2026 (5)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae