Consecration and Materiality
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3757953 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Fiona Rose Greenland (University of Virginia, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2021 |
| Volume | 65 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 140-158 |
| Publication date | 2021-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | American Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0002764218801063 |
| OpenAlex | W2898249470 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 29 |
This article focuses on a case of failed consecration: the Egyptian obelisk in New York's Central Park, commonly known as Cleopatra's Needle. The obelisk arrived in New York from Alexandria in 1880, with great fanfare. For a brief period, it was the talk of the town: a tourist curiosity and star of advertising campaigns for consumer goods. After an initial surge in public visibility, the monument's prominence faded. Today, the obelisk is not on the list of New York's top cultural attractions, and no longer features in media campaigns or political rallies. I ask why the obelisk's initial popularity failed to crystallize into an enduring condition of consecration. To answer this question, I use archival data to chart the obelisk's transfer of ownership and planned move, through its Central Park début and subsequent decline in cultural salience. The obelisk met key criteria associated with successful cases of retrospective consecration. What weakened the obelisk's career were lack of consecrating institutions and inherently unstable material conditions. These mechanisms are symbiotically related: because no institution took responsibility for conserving and protecting the obelisk, its granite face rapidly deteriorated and frustrated attempts to attract potential consecrating institutions. The article makes a twofold contribution to the literature on retrospective consecration. First, by discussing a failed case, it highlights the linked efficacy of consecration formation mechanisms. Second, in focusing on an ancient monument, it demonstrates the role played by materials and the specific measures of consecration that obtain in the broader sphere of ancient monuments
Archaeology · Consecration · Political science · Sociology · Archaeological Research and Protection · Classical Antiquity Studies · Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation · History · Law
Counterheritage
Best Laid Plans
Impossible Engineering
What About Mozart? What About Murder?
Intangible Heritage as Metacultural Production1
Negative Heritage
Global cultural governance. Decision-making concerning world heritage between politics and science
The New York Obelisk or How Cleopatra's Needle Came to New York and What Happened When It Got Here
Patina
The Search for God in Ancient Egypt
TheParthenonMarbles as icons of nationalism in nineteenth-centuryBritain
Cultural entrepreneurship in nineteenth-century Boston
The Institutionalization of Fame
A general theory of artistic legitimation
Unesco and the Fate of the World Heritage Indigenous Peoples Council of Experts (WHIPCOE)
History and the National Sensorium
Retrospective Cultural Consecration in Popular Music
The Elementary Forms of Religious Life
Critical Discourse and the Cultural Consecration of American Films
Profane archaeology and the existential dialectics of the city
Arrested Heritage
Color Perception in Sociology
On Comparative Analysis, Interdisciplinarity and Internationalization in Sociology
Recognition and Renown
Preserving the unpreservable
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,5 |
| Citation span | 2022 - 2026 (5) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |