Co-Orientation Between Publics in Two Countries

A Decade Later

Bibliographic Data

ID3758794
AuthorsAna Tkalac Verčič (0000-0002-9538-673X, University of Zagreb, corresponding author), Dejan Verčič (0000-0002-9639-0749, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia), Kristina Laco (Communications Office Colić, Colic, Laco & Partners, Zagreb, Croatia)
Year2019
Volume63
Issue12
Pages1624-1642
Publication date2019-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0002764219835262
OpenAlexW2921140801
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited22

Thirteen years ago, a study was conducted in which authors opened a question of applying co-orientation theory in studying communication behavior between two countries. The original study had two primary objectives: to compare attitudes toward certain issues relevant for the two nations and to examine degrees of agreement, accuracy, and congruency between two nations under the co-orientation model. The original study was later extended with another one in which authors included a third country and introduced not only evaluations of two countries' attitudes toward a third country but also evaluations of opinions the two countries have between themselves (and to which the first is only an observer). They called it "second-order co-orientation." More than a decade later, the original study was replicated to test how potential agreement, accuracy, and congruency between the two counties on these issues have changed over time

Developing country · Economic growth · Economics · Observer (physics) · Orientation (vector space) · Political science · Test (biology) · Mathematics · Media Studies and Communication · Psychology · Public Relations and Crisis Communication · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub