This is Clearly Fake! Mis- and Disinformation Beliefs and the (Accurate) Recognition of Pseudo-Information-Evidence From the United States and the Netherlands

Bibliographic Data

ID3759396
AuthorsMichael Hameleers (0000-0002-8038-5005, University of Amsterdam, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume68
Issue10
Pages1249-1268
Publication date2024-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Behavioral Scientist (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-7642 • E-ISSN: 1552-3381
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/00027642231174334
OpenAlexW4377098143
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited32

To understand how beliefs about mis- and disinformation affect citizens' (correct) classification of pseudo-information, this paper relies on an experimental survey study in the United States and the Netherlands in which we (a) measured mis- and disinformation attitudes, (b) exposed participants to a real versus fake article on immigration and criminality, and (c) compared classifications of mis- and disinformation in response to the real and fake news article. The main findings indicate that the veracity of information did not play a clear role in the attribution of mis- and disinformation. People with stronger mis- and disinformation beliefs, and people with incongruent prior attitudes, were most likely to classify information as false irrespective of the level of untruthfulness. These findings imply that beliefs about misinformation play a key role in the classification of information as false, whereas these beliefs do not contribute to the accuracy of veracity judgments

Affect (linguistics) · Attribution · Computer security · Disinformation · Internet privacy · Misinformation · Political science · Social media · Communication · Computer Science · Hate Speech and Cyberbullying Detection · Law · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Social Media and Politics · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access