Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Formal and Informal Amendment of the United States Constitution

Bibliographic Data

ID3759978
AuthorsRichard Kay (0000-0001-8968-0951, University of Connecticut, corresponding author)
Year2018
Volume66
Issuesuppl_1
Pages243-268
Publication date2018-07-04
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueThe American Journal of Comparative Law (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0002-919X • E-ISSN: 2326-9197
PublisherOxford University Press (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1093/ajcl/avy019
OpenAlexW2787762713
LanguageEN
Citations received3

This is the United States report submitted for the session on Formal and Informal Constitutional Amendment at the Twentieth Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law to be held in Fukuoka, Japan in July, 2018. The report reviews Article V of the United States Constitution setting out the rules for constitutional amendment and it provides a brief chronology of the twenty-eight amendments adopted to date. It notes a number of potential problems of interpretation associated with Article V. The report considers the widely held assumption that the United States Constitution is one of the hardest, if not the hardest. constitution in the world to change. It goes on to discuss possible limits on the substance of constitutional amendments. Some of these are set out in Article V but, as some other jurisdictions have recognized, there may be further, implicit restrictions based on the distinction between constitutional amendment and constitutional replacement. Many issues associated with constitutional amendment remain unresolved as a result of the Supreme Court’s reluctance to pronounce on the validity of amendments. Finally, the report compares the Article V process to the very significant constitutional change that has been accomplished through the constitutional interpretation of the United States Supreme Court. It concludes that jurisdictions like the United States where the constitution is treated with undisguised reverence, face a dilemma. Limiting constitutional revision to the formal process will eventually result in a constitution that is radically unsuitable for a modern society. But allowing irregular modification by judges sacrifices the key values of security, stability and predictability, the reasons we have a written constitution in the first place

Constitution · Constitutional amendment · Constitutional law · Political science · Search and seizure · Supreme court · Comparative constitutional jurisprudence studies · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Legal and Constitutional Studies

  • The “unwritten” Constitution

    Open Access•Antonia Baraggia•A&C - Revista de Direito…•2021

  • Constitutional Amendment Proposals as Position-Taking Activity in the U.S. House of Representatives (1979–2020)

    Open Access•Alexander H Cohen•American Politics Research•2026

  • Constitutional Rigidity Matters

    Open Access•George Tsebelis•British Journal of Political…•2022

Citations per year0.6
Citation span2021 - 2026 (6)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae