Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Leapfrog Representation and Extremism

A Study of American Voters and Their Members in Congress

Bibliographic Data

ID3763992
AuthorsJoseph Bafumi (Dartmouth Hospital), Michael C Herron (0000-0002-2021-2495, Dartmouth Hospital)
Year2010
Volume104
Issue3
Pages519-542
Publication date2010-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAmerican Political Science Review (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0003-0554 • E-ISSN: 1537-5943
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/s0003055410000316
OpenAlexW2018678655
LanguageEN
Citations received273
References cited60

We consider the relationship between the preferences of American voters and the preferences of the U.S. legislators who represent them. Using an Internet-based, national opinion survey in conjunction with legislator voting records from the 109th and 110th Congresses, we show that members of Congress are more extreme than their constituents, i.e., that there is a lack of congruence between American voters and members of Congress. We also show that when a congressional legislator is replaced by a new member of the opposite party, one relative extremist is replaced by an opposing extremist. We call this leapfrog representation, a form of representation that leaves moderates with a dearth of representation in Congress. We see evidence of leapfrog representation in states and House districts and in the aggregate as well: the median member of the 109th House was too conservative compared to the median American voter, yet the median of the 110th House was too liberal. Thus, the median American voter was leapfrogged when the 109th House transitioned to the 110th. Although turnover between the 109th and 110th Senates occurred at approximately the same rate as between the 109th and 110th Houses, the Senate appears to be a more moderate institution whose median member does not move as abruptly as that of the House

Baton rouge · House of Representatives · Legislator · Legislature · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Representation (politics · Roll call · Sociology · Voting · Electoral Systems and Political Participation · Gender Politics and Representation · Judicial and Constitutional Studies · Law · Public Administration

  • Does preference intensity matter? Reexamining policy representation in the American states

    Open Access•Zachary Peskowitz, Eddy S F Yeung•Political Science Research and…•2026

  • Grand Strategy in a Fractured Marketplace of Ideas

    Daniel W Drezner, Daniel Drezner•Oxford Handbook of Grand Strategy•2021

  • Candidates and Voters

    Open Access•Walter J Stone•Candidates and Voters•2017

  • Opting Out of Congress

    Open Access•Danielle M Thomsen•Opting Out of Congress•2017

  • Campaign Finance and Political Polarization

    Open Access•Raymond J La Raja, Bertram Schaffner•Campaign finance and political…•2015

  • Polarization

    Nolan Mccarty•Polarization•2019

  • Causes and Consequences of Polarization

    Open Access•Michael J Barber, Michael Barber et al.•Solutions to Political…•2015

  • Police as Policymakers

    Open Access•Sierra-Arévalo Michael, José J Alcocer et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • La evaluación de escalas de conocimiento político entre países

    Open Access•Frederico Batista Pereira•Revista Latinoamericana de…•2020

  • Exposure to international trade lowers green voting and worsens environmental attitudes

    Open Access•Charlotte Bez, Valentina Bosetti et al.•Nature Climate Change•2023

  • Constitutional Amendment Proposals as Position-Taking Activity in the U.S. House of Representatives (1979–2020)

    Open Access•Alexander H Cohen•American Politics Research•2026

  • Climate change threats and affective polarization. Exploring the role of negative emotional reactions

    Open Access•Amanda Remsö, Emma A Renström et al.•Analyses of Social Issues and…•2025

  • Uniform Punishment and Conditional Reward

    Open Access•Benjamin Highton, Erik J Engstrom•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2026

  • Does the winner take it all? Federal policies and political extremism

    Open Access•Gianmarco Daniele, Amedeo Piolatto et al.•Regional Science and Urban…•2024

  • Out of Step and Still in Congress? Electoral Consequences of Incumbent and Challenger Positioning Across Time

    Brandice Canes-Wrone, Michael R Kistner•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2022

  • Legislative Organization and Political Representation

    Michael P Olson, Jon C Rogowski•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2024

  • Locally Controlled Minimum Wages Leapfrog Public Preferences

    Gábor Simonovits, Julia A Payson•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2023

  • Insights from the Blinder—Oaxaca Decomposition on Polarization in the US Senate

    Daniel M Butler•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2021

  • Lifeblood of the Party

    Holly Ann Garnett, Scott Pruyser et al.•The American Review of Canadian…•2022

  • Promoting Conspiracy Theories Strategically

    David Hilden, Michael R Kistner•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2025

  • Advocacy in Nonprofit Organizations

    Open Access•Dyana P Mason•Nonprofit Policy Forum•2015

  • Bias in Cable News

    Gary J Martins, Gregory J Martin et al.•American Economic Review•2017

  • Start Spreading the Views

    Open Access•Cheryl Boudreau, Jonathan Colner et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • Affective Representation in Congress

    Open Access•Richard Dawkins, Adam Cayton et al.•Political Behavior•2026

  • Voter Learning, Unidimensional Ideology, and Polarization

    Open Access•Martin Vaeth•SSRN Electronic Journal•2023

  • Race, Partisanship, and Attitudes Toward Public Policy Commonality and Legislative Districts

    Open Access•Jason P Casellas, Daniel Q Gillion et al.•The Journal of Race Ethnicity and…•2019

  • Candidate Positions, Responsiveness, and Returns to Extremism

    Mellissa Meisels•The Journal of Politics•2025

  • Exploring the link between public health compliance and voting patterns in the 2020 U.S. presidential election

    Open Access•Florent Nkouaga•Frontiers in Political Science•2024

  • Leaders as cognitive shortcuts

    Stefano Camatarri, Mariano Cavataio•Contemporary Italian Politics•2016

  • Morris Fiorina’s Foundational Contributions to the Study of Partisanship and Mass Polarization

    Open Access•Matthew Levendusky•The Forum•2017

  • Richer Parties, Better Politics? Party-Centered Campaign Finance Laws and American Democracy

    Open Access•Raymond J La Raja•The Forum•2013

  • Who is Ideological? Measuring Ideological Consistency in the American Public

    Open Access•Michael Barber, John Collins Pope•The Forum•2018

  • Why Polarized Trust Matters”

    Open Access•Marc J Hetherington•The Forum•2015

  • A Global Measure of Judicial Independence, 1948–2012

    Open Access•Drew A Linzer, Jeffrey K Staton•Journal of Law and Courts•2015

  • Measuring Latent Constructs in Nonprofit Surveys with Item Response Theory

    Open Access•Dyana P Mason•Nonprofit Policy Forum•2017

  • PACs and January 6th

    Open Access•Keva M Miller, Tanner Bates•Research & Politics•2023

  • The Impact of Political Memes

    Thomas Galipeau•Journal of Information Technology…•2022

  • Blessing or curse? A critical review of the paradoxical consequences of direct public funding for political parties

    Open Access•Fernando Casal Bértoa, William C R Horncastle et al.•European Political Science Review•2025

  • The Effect of Electoral Competitiveness on Ideological Voting Patterns in the U . S . House, 2002‐10

    Open Access•Eric A Lindgren, Priscilla L Southwell•Politics & Policy•2014

  • The Majority-Party Disadvantage

    James J Feigenbaum, Alexander Fouirnaies et al.•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2017

  • Popular Control of Public Policy

    John G Matsusaka•Quarterly Journal of Political…•2010

  • Political sorting in U.S. entertainment media

    Sarah Bachleda Fioroni, Amanda D Lotz et al.•Popular Communication•2021

  • Does the U.S. Congress Respond to Public Opinion on Trade

    Open Access•Boram Lee, Michael Pomirchy et al.•American Politics Research•2023

  • Institutional Design and Policy Responsiveness in US States

    Open Access•Scott James Lacombe•American Politics Research•2022

  • The Effects of Polarization on Ideological Certainty

    Open Access•Mark Brockway, Gary E Hollibaugh•American Politics Research•2018

  • Dyadic representation in parliamentary democracy in Japan

    Open Access•Michio Umeda•Japanese Journal of Political…•2022

  • Foreign policy free agents

    Open Access•Patrick Homan, Jeffrey S Lantis•International Politics•2022

  • Congruence between voters and representatives in preferences for social policies in Spain

    Antonio M Jaime‐castillo, Xavier Coller Porta•Journal of Legislative Studies•2022

  • Ideological cross-pressures or random error? An analysis of spatially inconsistent voting in the US House and US Senate

    C Algara, Joseph Zamadics•Journal of Legislative Studies•2021

  • Are Voters’ Preferences Being Ignored in Governor’s Agendas

    Open Access•Benjamin S Noble, Daniel M Butler•Political Research Quarterly•2026

  • Political Ideology and Issue Importance

    Open Access•Deborah Rice, Bertram Schaffner et al.•Political Research Quarterly•2020

  • Explaining Differences in Voting Patterns across Voting Domains Using Hierarchical Bayesian Models

    Open Access•Erin Lipman, Scott Moser et al.•Political Analysis•2025

  • Scaling Data from Multiple Sources

    Open Access•Ted Enamorado, Gabriel López‐moctezuma et al.•Political Analysis•2020

  • Dynamic Elections and Ideological Polarization

    Open Access•Salvatore Nunnari, Jan Zápal•Political Analysis•2017

  • A Nonparametric Bayesian Model for Detecting Differential Item Functioning

    Open Access•Yuki Shiraito, James Lo et al.•Political Analysis•2023

  • Legislative Control and Partisan Disparities in Dyadic Representation

    Open Access•Daniel M Butler, Zoe Nemerever et al.•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2025

  • Reconciling Candidate Extremism and Spatial Voting

    Open Access•Benjamin Highton, Walter J Stone•Legislative Studies Quarterly•2020

  • Party Polarization and the Ascendance of Bipartisan Posturing as a Dominant Strategy in Presidential Rhetoric

    Open Access•Jesse H Rhodes•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2014

  • The Historical Presidency

    Open Access•Jesse H Rhodes, Amber B Vayo•Presidential Studies Quarterly•2019

  • What would delegates do? When and how the delegate paradox affects estimates of ideological congruence

    Open Access•Matthew H Graham, Lilla V Orr•Electoral Studies•2020

  • Polarization, candidate positioning, and political participation in the U.S

    Open Access•Elizabeth N Simas, Adam Ozer et al.•Electoral Studies•2021

  • Welfare, egalitarianism, and polarization

    Open Access•Eric Paul Svensen•Journal of Public Policy•2024

  • An Ordinal Item Response Model for Understanding Attitudes

    Open Access•Ingrid Mauerer, Gerhard Tutz•Sociological Methods & Research•2025

  • Polarization and ideological congruence between parties and supporters in Europe

    Open Access•Royce Carroll, Hiroki Kubo•Public Choice•2018

  • Saying versus doing

    Open Access•Nicu Haas, Rebecca B Morton•Public Choice•2018

  • Silent promotion of agendas

    Open Access•Hideo Konishi, Chen-Yu Pan•Public Choice•2020

  • The ideological nationalization of partisan subconstituencies in the American States

    Open Access•Devin Caughey, James Dunham et al.•Public Choice•2018

  • The volatility of median and supermajoritarian pivots in the U.S. Congress and the effects of party polarization

    Open Access•Thomas L Brunell, B Grofman et al.•Public Choice•2016

  • Candidate positioning and responsiveness to constituent opinion in the U.S. House of Representatives

    Open Access•Michael Peres, Michael Peress•Public Choice•2013

  • Strength in numbers

    Open Access•Lindsey Cormack•Social Science Quarterly•2021

  • Representation Imperatives in the Public Mind

    Open Access•David Doherty, Amanda Clare Bryan et al.•Social Science Quarterly•2019

  • Institutional design and the stability of responsiveness in the American states

    Open Access•Scott James Lacombe•Social Science Quarterly•2024

  • The Role of Interest Groups and Group Interests on Gun Legislation in the U.S. House

    Open Access•Robert Richards•Social Science Quarterly•2017

  • Local Authority Bureaucracies

    Open Access•Dag Ingvar Jacobsen•Public Administration•2012

  • Measuring Strategic Positioning in Congressional Elections

    Colin R Case•The Journal of Politics•2025

  • Dynamic Collective Choice with Endogenous Status Quo

    Wioletta Dziuda, Antoine Loeper•Journal of Political Economy•2016

  • Do Donors Punish Extremist Primary Nominees? Evidence from Congress and American State Legislatures

    Open Access•Andrew C W Myers•American Political Science Review•2025

  • Preference Representation and the Influence of Political Parties in Majoritarian vs. Proportional Systems

    Open Access•David Stadelmann, Marco Portmann et al.•British Journal of Political…•2016

  • Mass Versus Donor Attitudes on the Importance of Supreme Court Nominations

    Open Access•Brandice Canes-Wrone, Jonathan P Kastellec et al.•American Political Science Review•2025

  • Reassessing Extremism, Polarization, and Constraint with Continuous Policy Questions

    Open Access•Anthony Fowler•Political Behavior•2026

  • The Social Structure of Political Echo Chambers

    Open Access•A Boutyline, R Willer•Political Psychology•2017

  • A Common Left-Right Scale for Voters and Parties in Europe

    Open Access•James Lo, Sven-Oliver Proksch et al.•Political Analysis•2014

  • The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization in the U.S. Electorate

    Open Access•Steven W Webster, Alan I Abramowitz•American Politics Research•2017

  • Elections and Divisiveness

    Elliott Ash, Massimo Morelli et al.•The Journal of Politics•2017

  • Debate Reaction Ideal Points

    Daniel Argyle, Lisa P Argyle et al.•Statistics Politics and Policy•2021

  • Estimating the Conflict Dimensionality in the German Länder from Vote Advice Applications, 2014–2017

    Dominic Nyhuis, Pascal D König•Statistics Politics and Policy•2018

  • It’s the economy, stupid

    Open Access•Alonso Bustamante, Marcela Parada‐contzen et al.•Regional Studies Regional Science•2025

  • Does Inattention to Political Debate Explain the Polarization Gap between the U.S. Congress and Public

    Benjamin E Lauderdale•Public Opinion Quarterly•2013

  • Congressional Approval and Responsible Party Government

    Open Access•C Algara•Political Behavior•2021

  • The Partisanship of Bipartisanship

    Open Access•Sean Westwood•Political Behavior•2022

  • Hierarchical Item Response Models for Analyzing Public Opinion

    Open Access•Xiang Zhou•Political Analysis•2019

  • Estimating the Political Center from Aggregate Data

    Open Access•Anthony J Mcgann•Political Analysis•2013

  • Estimating Constituency Preferences from Sparse Survey Data Using Auxiliary Geographic Information

    Open Access•Peter Selb, Simon Munzert•Political Analysis•2011

  • Replacement in the U.S. House

    Open Access•Thomas L Brunell, B Grofman et al.•Party Politics•2014

  • The rise of negative partisanship and the nationalization of U.S. elections in the 21st century

    Open Access•Alan I Abramowitz, Steven Webster et al.•Electoral Studies•2015

  • From opinions to policies

    Open Access•Mikael Persson•Electoral Studies•2021

  • Balancing act? Testing a theory of split-party U.S. Senate delegations

    Open Access•Christopher P Donnelly•Electoral Studies•2015

  • Giving to the Extreme? Experimental Evidence on Donor Response to Candidate and District Characteristics

    Open Access•Mellissa Meisels, Joshua D Clinton et al.•British Journal of Political…•2024

  • A Broken Public? Americans’ Responses to the Great Recession

    Open Access•Clem Brooks, Jeff Manza•American Sociological Review•2013

  • Responsiveness without Representation

    Open Access•Gábor Simonovits, Allison M Gue et al.•American Journal of Political…•2018

  • Spatial Strategies When Candidates Have Policy Preferences

    Open Access•Donald Wittman•Advances in the Spatial Theory of…•1990

  • Issue Politics in Congress

    Open Access•Tracy Sulkin•Issue politics in Congress•2005

  • Tides of Consent

    Open Access•James A Stimson•Tides of Consent•2004

  • Linear Probability Models of the Demand for Attributes with an Empirical Application to Estimating the Preferences of Legislators

    Open Access•James J Heckman, Jane Mcintosh Snyder et al.•The RAND Journal of Economics•1997

  • Public Opinion and Public Policy

    Stuart Soroka, Stuart N Soroka et al.•The Oxford handbook of Canadian…•2010

  • A Theory of Divided Government

    Alberto Alesina, Howard Rosenthal et al.•Econometrica•1996

  • Advances in the spatial theory of voting

    James M Enelow, Melvin J Hinich•Advances in the Spatial Theory of…•1990

  • An economic theory of democracy

    Anthony Downs•An economic theory of democracy•1985

  • The Disappearing Center

    Alan I Abramowitz•Disappearing Center•2017

  • American Public Opinion

    Robert S Erikson, Robert Erikson et al.•American Public Opinion•2015

  • Advances in the Spatial Theory of Voting

    Open Access•Kenneth Arrow, Kenneth Joseph Arrow et al.•Advances in the Spatial Theory of…•1990

  • The Theory of Committees and Elections

    Open Access•Duncan Black, Georg Kunze•Theory of Committees and Elections•1986

  • Ideological Change in the U. S. Senate

    Open Access•Richard C Elling•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1982

  • Ideology, ?shirking?, and representation

    Open Access•Keith T Poole, Thomas Romer•Public Choice•1993

  • Changing minds? Not in Congress

    Open Access•Keith T Poole•Public Choice•2007

  • Beyond the Median

    Elisabeth R Gerber, Jamie B Lewis•Journal of Political Economy•2004

  • Democracy as a Latent Variable

    Open Access•Shawn Treier, Simon Jackman•American Journal of Political…•2008

  • Measuring District-Level Partisanship with Implications for the Analysis of U.S. Elections

    Matthew S Levendusky, Matthew Levendusky et al.•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • Dynamic Ideal Point Estimation via Markov Chain Monte Carlo for the U.S. Supreme Court, 1953–1999

    Open Access•A D Martins, Andrew D Martin et al.•Political Analysis•2002

  • Comparing Interest Group Scores across Time and Chambers

    Open Access•Tim Groseclose, Steven D Levitt et al.•American Political Science Review•1999

  • Candidate Positioning in U.S. House Elections

    Stephen Ansolabehere, Jane Mcintosh Snyder et al.•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Black Candidates and Black Voters

    Michael C Herron, Jasjeet S Sekhon•The Journal of Politics•2005

  • Balancing, Generic Polls and Midterm Congressional Elections

    Joseph Bafumi, Robert S Erikson et al.•The Journal of Politics•2010

  • Representation in Congress

    Joshua D Clinton•The Journal of Politics•2006

  • Is Polarization a Myth

    Alan I Abramowitz, Kyle L Saunders•The Journal of Politics•2008

  • Public Opinion and Public Policy, 1980-1993

    Alan D Monroe•Public Opinion Quarterly•1998

  • Ideological Thinking Among Mass Publics and Political Elites

    M Kent Jenning, M Kent Jennings•Public Opinion Quarterly•1992

  • Of Shirking, Outliers, and Statistical Artifacts

    Open Access•Christopher Lawrence, Christopher N Lawrence•Political Research Quarterly•2007

  • Practical Issues in Implementing and Understanding Bayesian Ideal Point Estimation

    Open Access•Joseph Bafumi, Andrew Gelman et al.•Political Analysis•2005

  • Estimating Legislators' Preferred Points

    Open Access•John Londregan•Political Analysis•1999

  • Shirking in the Contemporary Congress

    Open Access•Jamie L Carson, Michael H Crespin et al.•Political Analysis•2004

  • Multidimensional Analysis of Roll Call Data via Bayesian Simulation

    Open Access•Simon Jackman•Political Analysis•2001

  • Artificial Extremism in Interest Group Ratings

    Open Access•Jane Mcintosh Snyder, James M Snyder•Legislative Studies Quarterly•1992

  • Democratic theory and electoral reality

    Philip E Converse•Critical Review•2006

  • Comparable Preference Estimates across Time and Institutions for the Court, Congress, and Presidency

    Open Access•Michael A Bailey•American Journal of Political…•2007

  • How Does Voting Equipment Affect the Racial Gap in Voided Ballots

    Open Access•Michael Tomz, Robert P Van Houweling•American Journal of Political…•2003

  • Robustness of the Multidimensional Voting Model

    Randall L Calvert•American Journal of Political…•1985

  • The Public as Thermostat

    Christopher Wlezien•American Journal of Political…•1995

  • Leadership and Pandering

    Brandice Canes-Wrone, Michael C Herron et al.•American Journal of Political…•2001

  • Measuring Representation

    Christopher H Achen•American Journal of Political…•1978

  • Belief Systems

    James A Stimson•American Journal of Political…•1975

  • Constituency Opinion and Congressional Behavior

    Robert S Erikson•American Journal of Political…•1978

  • Measuring Representation

    Christopher H Achen•American Journal of Political…•1977

  • Does Gerrymandering Cause Polarization

    Open Access•Nolan Mccarty, Keith T Poole et al.•American Journal of Political…•2009

  • Dynamics of Representation

    Open Access•Christopher Wlezien•British Journal of Political…•1996

  • Ideological Realignment and Active Partisans in the American Electorate

    Open Access•Kyle L Saunders, Alan I Abramowitz•American Politics Research•2004

  • A More Representative United States House of Representatives

    Open Access•Joseph F Zimmerman, Wilma Rule•PS Political Science & Politics•1998

  • A technique for estimating candidate and voter locations

    Open Access•Barry C Burden, Barry Burden•Electoral Studies•2004

  • Constituency Influence in Congress

    Open Access•Warren E Miller, Donald E Stokes et al.•American Political Science Review•1963

  • Electoral Competition with Informed and Uninformed Voters

    Open Access•David P Baron•American Political Science Review•1994

  • Spatial Voting in the 2004 Presidential Election

    Open Access•Steve Jessee, Stephen A Jessee•American Political Science Review•2009

  • Dynamic Representation

    Open Access•James A Stimson, James Stimson et al.•American Political Science Review•1995

  • The Nature of Political Representation, II

    Open Access•John A Fairlie•American Political Science Review•1940

  • The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data

    Open Access•Joshua D Clinton, Joshua Clinton et al.•American Political Science Review•2004

  • The Nature of Political Representation, I

    Open Access•John A Fairlie•American Political Science Review•1940

Unique citing works273
Citations per year17,06
Citation span2010 - 2026 (17)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedYes
Citation typesNeutral: 272

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae