Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Bearing Witness to Traumatic Memory

An Ethical Approach to Ken Liu’s Speculative Fiction “The Man Who Ended History - A Documentary

Bibliographic Data

ID3774374
AuthorsXia Meng (0000-0002-1194-9233, UNSW Sydney, corresponding author), Meng Xia (0000-0002-2676-9032, Communication University of Zhejiang)
Year2022
Volume27
Issue2
Pages100-113
Publication date2022-03-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAngelaki (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0969-725X • E-ISSN: 1469-2899
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/0969725x.2022.2046377
OpenAlexW4221072838
LanguageEN
References cited10

This article looks at the problematic witnessing envisioned in Chinese American writer Ken Liu’s speculative fiction “The Man Who Ended History - A Documentary,” in which the back-to-the-past virtual witness is actualized through time travel. Ken Liu’s writing contributes a documentary narrative of the witnessing of witnessing that extends the temporal dimension of witness and allows the flow between fictive and factual. This thought experiment posits a perspective into the interweaving acts and performances of witnessing to etch the ethics in witnessing and testimony of traumatic events, particularly in the global context. I argue that Liu’s novella uncovers the ethical relational witnessing in which “prosthetic memory” is produced and that affects postmemorial and the implicated subjects. The virtual reality witnessing bestows a strong agency upon witnesses while yet ethical concerns arise. Liu’s writing shows that witness and testimony both steer the path to shared memory in a possibly ethical way when channelled through moral emotions; virtual reality witnessing generates the private contact with historical experiences rather than one’s lived experiences. Thus, I identify the ethical stakes and possible settlements in witness and testimony when they are taken as continuing, relational acts, and as performances of emotional, sensuous experience, when witnessing and remembering become politicized and instrumentalized. Firstly, witnessing is problematized and debated particularly in terms of the perpetrator’s testimony. I argue that the perpetrator’s testimony can transfer trauma into collective remembering rather than individual redemption. On the debate over negative emotions in witnessing, I argue that through negative moral emotions ethical witnessing and its testimony are motivated, though they are often evaded or appropriated. Further, I demonstrate that empathetic witnessing is indicated in Liu’s writing, by negotiating the sensitivity in witness and testimony with an evaluative distance from the past. Liu’s empathetic narrative is founded on his investigation of historical trauma and his meditation on structural trauma

Bearing (navigation · Witness · Computer Science · Grief, Bereavement, and Mental Health · Memory, Trauma, and Commemoration · Middle East and Rwanda Conflicts · Psychology · Artificial Intelligence

  • Writing History, Writing Trauma

    Dominick Lacapra•Writing History, Writing Trauma•2014

  • The Long Defeat

    Amiko Hashimoto, Akiko Hashimoto•Long Defeat•2015

  • The Ethics of Memory

    Avishai Margalit•The Ethics of Memory•2002

  • Introduction

    Michael Richardson, Kerstin Schankweiler•Parallax•2020

  • The Generation of Postmemory

    Marianne Hirsch•Poetics Today•2008

  • The Uses of Genre and the Classification of Speculative Fiction

    R B Gill, ROMA GILL•Mosaic•2013

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae