Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Arqueología para América Latina en el siglo XXI

Bibliographic Data

ID3779922
AuthorsAlexander Herrera Wassilowsky (Universidad de los Andes), Alexander Herrera (0000-0001-9012-9745, Smithsonian Institution), L Antonio Curet (Smithsonian Institution)
Year2019
Issue36
Pages3-10
Publication date2019-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAntípoda Revista de Antropología y Arqueología (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 2011-4273 • E-ISSN: 1900-5407
PublisherUniversidad de los Andes (PUBLISHER • VE)
DOI10.7440/antipoda36.2019.01
OpenAlexW2953746426
LanguageES
References cited2

Objective/context: The purpose of this article is to provide the historical and theoretical framework of Latin American archaeology to contextualize the essays included in this volume. It is argued that recent changes in this discipline arise as part of a self-evaluation of archaeologists in relation to the colonialist origin of this science. Methodology: The article begins with a brief discussion of the most recent significant changes that have established new standards in the discipline, created by the archaeologist’s obligation to confront two realities. The first is the above-mentioned colonialist origin of archaeology, especially when considering the total absence of the indigenous story in our reconstructions of their ancestors. The second is the advance of capitalism and economic development, accompanied by political interests that include, among other things, the use of archaeological sites and artifacts for tourism or the recording of their destruction as a prelude to industrial infrastructure or extractive projects. It presents a brief account of the discipline in the region, from the eighteenth century to the nationalist movements and the present, which also poses the challenge of building alternative narratives to those proposed by the hegemonic axis of the traditional sciences and, above all, to recognize and include the silenced voices of the past. Conclusions: The text ends by presenting the articles in this issue and briefly contextualizing them within this new perspective on Latin American archaeology, concluding that, in recent decades, Latin American archaeology has taken new directions as a result of our reflection on its colonial past. Originality: In particular, this postcolonial archaeology, as some call it, challenges us to develop alternative perspectives, methods and interpretations that are more inclusive and encompassing as well as realistic. The contextualization of the colonial problem within the social, historical, economic and political conditions of the region is key to an understanding of this emerging archaeology and to motivating national and international dialogue between archaeologists and heritage stakeholders to promote a more fair and inclusive archaeology

Archaeology · Art · Capitalism · Colonialism · Context (archaeology · Hegemony · Humanities · Indigenous · Latin Americans · Literature · Narrative · Nationalism · Obligation · Originality · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Tourism · Anthropology · Archaeology and Cultural Heritage · Historical and Cultural Archaeology Studies · History · Indigenous Cultures and History · Law

  • The King, the Bishop, and the Creation of an American Antiquity

    Joanne Pillsbury, Lisa Trever•Ñawpa Pacha•2008

  • Decires fuera de lugar

    Walter D Mignolo•Revista de Crítica Literaria…•1995

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae