How Professors Think
Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3849953 |
|---|---|
| Authors | William M Chace (corresponding author) |
| Year | 2010 |
| Volume | 16 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 555-555 |
| Publication date | 2010-08-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Common Knowledge (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0961-754X • E-ISSN: 1538-4578 |
| Publisher | Duke University Press (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1215/0961754x-2010-014 |
| OpenAlex | W1978208366 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 12 |
Book Review| August 01 2010 How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment Michèle Lamont, How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009), 330 pp. William M. Chace William M. Chace Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Common Knowledge (2010) 16 (3): 555. https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754X-2010-014 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation William M. Chace; How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Common Knowledge 1 August 2010; 16 (3): 555. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754X-2010-014 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search Books & JournalsAll JournalsCommon Knowledge Search Advanced Search Duke University Press2010 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content
Citation · Download · Icon · Library science · Media studies · Search engine · Search engine optimization · Sociology · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Legal Education and Practice Innovations
Judging by the Rules? The emergence of evaluation practices
Temporality in Academic Evaluation
Evaluation and Merit-Based Increase in Academia
Rebeldia disciplinada
Achieving good science
Economists and Their Fan-clubs
Journal peer review in context
Is there gender bias in awarding cum laude for the PhD thesis
New public management and professionals in the public sector. What new patterns beyond opposition
Awards, Public Recognition, and Evaluation
Gatekeepers in Social Science
Expertise, Policy-making and Democracy
| Unique citing works | 12 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,8 |
| Citation span | 2011 - 2024 (14) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |