Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

How Professors Think

Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment

Bibliographic Data

ID3849953
AuthorsWilliam M Chace (corresponding author)
Year2010
Volume16
Issue3
Pages555-555
Publication date2010-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCommon Knowledge (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0961-754X • E-ISSN: 1538-4578
PublisherDuke University Press (PUBLISHER • US)
DOI10.1215/0961754x-2010-014
OpenAlexW1978208366
LanguageEN
Citations received12

Book Review| August 01 2010 How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment Michèle Lamont, How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009), 330 pp. William M. Chace William M. Chace Search for other works by this author on: This Site Google Common Knowledge (2010) 16 (3): 555. https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754X-2010-014 Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation William M. Chace; How Professors Think: Inside the Curious World of Academic Judgment. Common Knowledge 1 August 2010; 16 (3): 555. doi: https://doi.org/10.1215/0961754X-2010-014 Download citation file: Zotero Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search Books & JournalsAll JournalsCommon Knowledge Search Advanced Search Duke University Press2010 Article PDF first page preview Close Modal You do not currently have access to this content

Citation · Download · Icon · Library science · Media studies · Search engine · Search engine optimization · Sociology · World Wide Web · Computer Science · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Legal Education and Practice Innovations

  • Judging by the Rules? The emergence of evaluation practices

    Open Access•Stacy Lom•Valuation Studies•2024

  • Temporality in Academic Evaluation

    Open Access•Björn Hammarfelt, Alexander D Rushforth et al.•Valuation Studies•2020

  • Evaluation and Merit-Based Increase in Academia

    Open Access•Christine Musselin•Valuation Studies•2022

  • Rebeldia disciplinada

    Open Access•L Serrano Rodrigues, Lidiane Soares Rodrigues et al.•História da Historiografia…•2021

  • Achieving good science

    Open Access•J Pols, Amade M’charek et al.•Learning and Teaching•2024

  • Economists and Their Fan-clubs

    Open Access•Mikhail Sokolov, Maria Safonova•Sotsiologicheskoe Obozrenie /…•2024

  • Journal peer review in context

    Open Access•Wendy L Lipworth, Wendy Lipworth et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2011

  • Is there gender bias in awarding cum laude for the PhD thesis

    Open Access•Peter Van Den Besselaar, Charlie Mom•Scientometrics•2024

  • New public management and professionals in the public sector. What new patterns beyond opposition

    Open Access•Philippe Bezes, Didier Demazière et al.•Sociologie du Travail•2012

  • Awards, Public Recognition, and Evaluation

    Open Access•Rafael Y Schögler•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • Gatekeepers in Social Science

    Open Access•Barbara Hoenig•International Encyclopedia of the…•2015

  • Expertise, Policy-making and Democracy

    Open Access•Cathrine Holst, Anders Molander et al.•Expertise, Policy-Making and…•2022

Unique citing works12
Citations per year0,8
Citation span2011 - 2024 (14)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae