Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Journal peer review in context

A qualitative study of the social and subjective dimensions of manuscript review in biomedical publishing

Bibliographic Data

ID11697992
AuthorsWendy L Lipworth, Wendy Lipworth (0000-0002-0234-657X, The University of Sydney), Ian Kerridge (0000-0001-7445-4660, The University of Sydney), Ian H Kerridge, Stacy M Carter (0000-0003-2617-8694, The University of Sydney), Miles Little (0000-0002-5539-5754, The University of Sydney)
Year2011
Volume72
Issue7
Pages1056-1063
Publication date2011-02-19
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Science & Medicine (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0277-9536 • E-ISSN: 1873-5347
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.002
PMID21388730
OpenAlexW1995859479
LanguageEN
Citations received12
References cited11

Context (archaeology · Political science · Prejudice (legal term · Publishing · Salient · Sociology · Variety (cybernetics · Computer Science · Ethics in Clinical Research · Health and Medical Research Impacts · Law · Meta-analysis and systematic reviews · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Bias in peer review

    Open Access•Carole J Lee, Cassidy R Sugimoto et al.•Journal of the Association for…•2013

  • Influence of Text Mediation Upon the Academic Identities of Novice EAP Authors

    Open Access•Rongcheng Pan•International Journal of English…•2023

  • Criteria for assessing grant applications

    Open Access•Sven E Hug, Mirjam Aeschbach•Palgrave Communications•2020

  • Consistency index

    Open Access•Mingliang Yue, Hongbo Tang et al.•Scientometrics•2021

  • Renegotiating dimensions of the self

    Open Access•Susie Donnelly, Molly Manning et al.•Health Expectations•2020

  • Divergent characteristics of biomedical research across publication types

    Open Access•Chenxing Qian, Qingyue Guo•Quantitative Science Studies•2026

  • Feedback practices in journal peer-review

    Open Access•Sin Wang Chong, Ting Jun Lin et al.•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2024

  • The qualitative methodology

    Salomé Elizabeth Scholtz•Journal of Psychology in Africa•2023

  • Reflecting on reviewing

    Open Access•Dean Tjosvold•Journal of Organizational Behavior•2014

  • Doing reviews is an unpaid service”

    Open Access•Ting Zeng•International Journal of Applied…•2024

  • Chinese Researchers’ Orientation Toward Peer Review Through the Lens of Engagement

    Open Access•Ting Zeng, Jiao Li•International Journal of Applied…•2025

  • I don't see gender

    Open Access•Jamie Lundine, Ivy Lynn Bourgeault et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2019

  • Critical issues in qualitative research methods

    Janice M Morse•Critical issues in qualitative…•1994

  • The Edinburgh Dictionary of Continental Philosophy

    Christina Howells•French Studies•2006

  • The Edinburgh Dictionary of Continental Philosophy

    John Protevi•Edinburgh Dictionary of…•2005

  • How Professors Think

    William M Chace•Common Knowledge•2010

Unique citing works12
Citations per year0,92
Citation span2013 - 2026 (14)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 12

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae