The Paradoxes of Hegel's Lectures on Aesthetics
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3873205 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Pierre-Henry Frangne (corresponding author) |
| Year | 1998 |
| Volume | 12 |
| Issue | 12 |
| Pages | 8-10 |
| Publication date | 1998-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Critique d’art (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 1246-8258 • E-ISSN: 2265-9404 |
| Publisher | OpenEdition (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.4000/critiquedart.107168 |
| OpenAlex | W4386893013 |
| Language | EN |
A present-day reading of the first fine, painstaking and complete translation of Hegel’s Aesthetics, as undertaken by J-P. Lefebvre and V. von Schenk, calls for the identification of at least four paradoxes. The first is the best known: Hegel’s Aesthetics is not a book written by Hegel. It is a book written after Hegel’s death (1831à by one of his students, Gustav Hotho. This latter drew up the text of Aesthetics in 1835 by consulting the handwritten lectures which Hegel wrote between 1818 an
Aesthetics · Epistemology · Hegelianism · Critical Theory and Philosophy · Philosophy
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |