Estimation (Wahm) in Avicenna
The Logical and Psychological Dimensions
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3887683 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Deborah L Black (0000-0003-2263-6504, Pontifical Institute of Mediaeval Studies, corresponding author) |
| Year | 1993 |
| Volume | 32 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 219-258 |
| Publication date | 1993-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Dialogue (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0012-2173 • E-ISSN: 1759-0949 |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/s0012217300014414 |
| OpenAlex | W2100984824 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 26 |
| References cited | 10 |
One of the chief innovations in medieval adaptations of Aristotelian psychology was the expansion of Aristotle's notion of imagination orphantasiato include a variety of distinct perceptual powers known collectively as the internal senses (hawâss bâtinah). Amongst medieval philosophers in the Arabic world, Avicenna (Ibn Sînâ, 980-1037) offers one of the most complex and sophisticated accounts of the internal senses. Within his list of internal senses, Avicenna includes a faculty known as "estimation" (wahm), to which various functions are assigned in a wide variety of contexts. Although many philosophers in the Arabic world as well as in the Latin West accepted Avicenna's positing of an estimative faculty, Avicenna's best-known critics, al-Ghazâlî (1058-1111) and Averroes (Ibn Rushd, 1126-1198), found Avicenna's arguments in support of a distinct estimative faculty problematic. For different reasons, both Averroes and Ghazâlî raised the basic question of whether one needed to posit a distinct faculty of estimation to supplement the perceptual abilities of the other internal senses, and whether the notion of an estimative power as defined by Avicenna was internally coherent. Such criticisms suggest that the Avicennian conception of estimation is not entirely unambiguous, and that a correct understanding of Avicenna's motivations for delineating an estimative power requires a careful study of the diverse activities assigned to it throughout Avicenna's philosophical writings
Arabic · Art · Epistemology · Linguistics · Literature · Medieval Latin · Perception · Power (physics) · Variety (cybernetics) · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Historical Philosophy and Science · History of Medicine Studies · Medieval and Classical Philosophy · Philosophy · Psychology
Aristotle on Sleep and Wakefulness
Avicenna on Animal Self-Awareness, Cognition and Identity
Moving the Orbs
Avicenna against Mathematical Platonism
From Legal Theory to Erkenntnistheorie
The Intentio of Pastness in Aquinas's Theory of Memory
Opažanje i čulna spoznaja kod Tome Akvinskog
The Cambridge History of Medieval Philosophy
Arabic Poetics
Mysticism
Avicenna on empty intentionality
Avicenna on representation
“A discipline or part of a discipline”
The Mouse’s Tale
Varieties of consciousness in classical Arabic thought
Al-Ghazālī, nativism, and divine interventionism
Faḫr al-Dīn al-Rāzī on Animal Cognition and Immortality
Avicenna on Mathematical Infinity
La versión árabe del De divinatione per somnum de Aristóteles y su impacto en Avicena y su teoría de la profecía
Human Understanding and God-talk in Jāmī and Beyond
On Some Sceptical Elements in Barhebraeus
Avicenna on Compositive Imagination in the Context of Active Perception Debates
Marvels in the Medieval Imagination
Avicenna on the Nature of Mathematical Objects
Suffering the Sons of Eve
Greco-Roman Ethics and the Naturalistic Fantasy
| Unique citing works | 26 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,53 |
| Citation span | 2009 - 2025 (17) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 20 |