Comparing the content of sleep paralysis and dream reports

Bibliographic Data

ID3900506
AuthorsJennifer D Parker (0000-0002-4626-9916), Susan J Blackmore, Susan Blackmore (0000-0003-0845-2223)
Year2002
Volume12
Issue1
Pages45-59
Publication date2002-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueDreaming (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 1053-0797 • E-ISSN: 1573-3351
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1023/a:1013894522583
OpenAlexW1979444242
LanguageEN
Citations received11
References cited3

Hall and Van de Castle's method of content analysis, which has been extensively applied to dream content, was used to analyse SP reports. 64 males and 52 females each contributed one SP report. These were content analysed and compared with dream norms, revealing the similarities between dreams and SP. Findings indicate that, emotionally, SP is a more uniform state than dreaming, and that interactions between characters are more aggressive, with the “dreamer” being the victim of the attacks. SP reports contained more cognitive and auditory experiences, and four times as many references to parts of the body. Only one difference was found between males' and females' SP reports; that females reported more sexual activity. A description of a “typical” SP episode is presented, based upon the content analysis system. It was concluded that while SP and dreams share some subjective similarities, they can be identified as separate sleep states by the content of written reports. Furthermore, Hall and Van de Castle's system may provide the foundations for systematic comparisons of other sleep mentation and fantasy states

Content (measure theory · Dream · Paralysis · Psychiatry · Psychotherapist · Sleep (system call · Sleep paralysis · Computer Science · Neuroscience of respiration and sleep · Psychology · Sleep and related disorders · Sleep and Wakefulness Research · Neurology

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub