The rise of rebel contenders

Barriers to entry and fragmentation in civil wars

Bibliographic Data

ID3916024
AuthorsHanne Fjelde (0000-0001-5251-7309, Department of Peace and Conflict Research, Uppsala University & Peace Research Institute Oslo (PRIO)), David Nilsson (0000-0003-0205-2843, Uppsala University, corresponding author), Desiree Nilsson
Year2018
Volume55
Issue5
Pages551-565
Publication date2018-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Peace Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0022343318767497
OpenAlexW2807242756
LanguageEN
Citations received37
References cited52

Fragmentation of armed opposition movements through the rise of new rebel groups constitutes a significant challenge to conflict termination and peacebuilding. Yet, the question of why some rebel movements remain cohesive whereas others see a number of contending groups during the course of the armed conflict has received limited attention in existing research. This article addresses this gap by analyzing the determinants of the rise of rebel contenders in intrastate armed conflicts worldwide, 1975-2013. The theoretical framework focuses on barriers to entry, that is, variations in the costs and disadvantages that must be borne by nascent rebel contenders that are not borne to the same extent by incumbent rebel groups. The study proposes that strong social networks underpinning incumbent groups create structural barriers to entry for nascent groups by aggravating challenges of organization building. It further suggests that the interaction between incumbent groups and the government influences strategic barriers to entry as changes in government policies produce windows of opportunity for nascent groups to form. Consistent with these arguments, the study finds that when incumbent groups have strong networks - because rebels either tap into ethnic networks or draw on a leftist ideology - the risk of fragmentation is lower. Furthermore, when the government accommodates groups, through either negotiations or democratic concessions, the risk of fragmentation increases

Democracy · Fragmentation (computing) · Ideology · Negotiation · Opportunity structures · Opposition (politics) · Peacebuilding · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Underpinning · Computer Science · Engineering · Law · Peacebuilding and International Security · Political Conflict and Governance · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence

Tools

Open DOISci-HubOpen Access