Militant Splinter Groups and the Use of Violence
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 10071669 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Kaitlyn Robinson (0000-0002-1270-2507, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA, corresponding author), Iris Malone (0000-0003-2487-2754, Independent researcher) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 68 |
| Issue | 2-3 |
| Pages | 404-430 |
| Publication date | 2023-04-08 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Conflict Resolution (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-0027 • E-ISSN: 1552-8766 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publishing (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00220027231165466 |
| PMID | 41244749 |
| OpenAlex | W4362717772 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 50 |
Existing research portrays militant splinter groups as more violent than their parent organizations due to factors like more extreme preferences or capacity-building needs. Though widely held, the assumption that splinters are particularly violent has not been systematically tested. In this paper, we develop and test an alternative explanation for splinter behavior. We argue splinter groups often appear less violent than their parents due to an underlying selection effect. Splinters break away where there are large organizational barriers to internally address a faction’s grievances. These barriers tend to exist in well-organized parents that are also capable of high levels of violence. Splinter groups lack this established organizational infrastructure, resulting in lower levels of relative violence. We test this logic with an original dataset on parent and splinter groups and a pair of comparative case studies. We find that splinters are less violent than parent organizations, challenging conventional wisdom
Criminology · Militant · Political science · Politics · Selection (genetic algorithm · Sociology · Test (biology · Computer Science · Crime, Illicit Activities, and Governance · Law · Political Conflict and Governance · Psychology · Social Psychology · Terrorism, Counterterrorism, and Political Violence
Peace Under the Influence? The Role of Illicit Drug Economies in Peace Processes and Rebel Splintering
Dealing with Complexity in Civil War
Conflict Triggers and Resolution Strategies Among the Yahoo-Boys in Ede Town, Nigeria
Armed group proliferation and conflict dynamics
The recurrence of terrorism
Introducing the tracking of terrorist organization splintering (Totos) dataset
The Commander's Dilemma
Alliance Formation in Civil Wars
Handbook of Organizations (RLE
Divided Not Conquered
How Insurgency Begins
Violent Order
Insurgent Fragmentation in the Horn of Africa
How Terrorist Groups End
A Motion of No Confidence
Organizations at War
Mantiqi IV
Terrorist Factions
When Peace Leads to Divorce
From a Counter-Society to a Counter-State Movement
Terrorism in armed conflict
What explains ethnic organizational violence? Evidence from Eastern Europe and Russia
Opportunities to kill or incentives for restraint? Rebel capabilities, the origins of support, and civilian victimization in civil war
Rebel command and control, time, and rebel group splits
The Strategies of Terrorism
Spoiler Problems in Peace Processes
The Nature of the Beast
A Plague of Initials
Why Split? Organizational Splits among Ethnopolitical Organizations in the Middle East
The Grass Is Always Greener? Armed Group Side Switching in Civil Wars
Shirts Today, Skins Tomorrow
When Organizations Rebel
Unmasking Militants
Rebel Leaders, Internal Rivals, and External Resources
Internal Politics and the Fragmentation of Armed Groups
Sabotaging the Peace
The Causes of Terrorism
Balance of Loyalties
Actor Fragmentation and Civil War Bargaining
Organized violence, 1989-2019
Organizing for Resistance
Rebellion, mediation, and group change
Foreign Fighters, Rebel Command Structure, and Civilian Targeting in Civil War
Splinters and Schisms
Armed intervention and civilian victimization in intrastate conflicts
The downstream effects of combatant fragmentation on civil war recurrence
Organized violence, 1989-2018 and peace agreements
Conflict negotiations and rebel leader selection
The rise of rebel contenders
Divide and Conquer or Divide and Concede
Ethnicity, Insurgency, and Civil War
Case Selection via Matching
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 4 |