Measuring Affect and Action in Inter National Reaction Models
Empirical Materials From the 1962 Cuban Crisis
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3916260 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ole R Holsti (Studies in International Conflict and Integration Stanford University, Palo Alto, California), Richard A Brody (Studies in International Conflict and Integration Stanford University, Palo Alto, California), Robert C North (Studies in International Conflict and Integration Stanford University, Palo Alto, California) |
| Year | 1964 |
| Volume | 1 |
| Issue | 3-4 |
| Pages | 170-189 |
| Publication date | 1964-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Peace Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/002234336400100303 |
| OpenAlex | W2015637697 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 36 |
| References cited | 7 |
The Cuban crisis of October 1962 may be analyzed from several perspectives. The investigator may focus his attention on the unique characteristics of the situation and sequence of events which are outlined here. The analyst of international relations may, as is suggested in this paper, examine these events so as to permit relevant comparisons with other crisis situations, both those resolved by war and those eventually resolved by non-violent means. The conceptual framework for this analysis is a two-step mediated stimulus-response model in which the acts of one nation are considered as inputs to other nations. Such psycho-political variables as perceptions and expressions of hostility are traced over time by means of content analysis of documents to test the consistency of the model. In the Cuban crisis, both sides tended to perceive rather accurately the nature of the adversary's actions and then proceeded to act at an appropriate level. Efforts by either party to delay or reverse the escalation toward conflict were generally perceived as such, and responded to in like manner
Action (physics) · Adversary · Affect (linguistics) · Cognitive psychology · Computer security · Consistency (knowledge bases) · Hostility · Perception · Political science · Politics · Stimulus (psychology) · Artificial Intelligence · Communication · Computer Science · International Relations and Foreign Policy · Law · Psychology · Social Psychology
Polarity, Nuclear Weapons, and Major War
International restraints and foreign policy choices
Reciprocity in United States-Soviet Relations
Measuring Interstate Affect
Perceptual Illusions and Military Realities
Horse Races, Security Markets, and Foreign Relations
Evolving Foreign Policy Norms
Foreign Policy Decision-Making and the Environment
Indications, Warning, and Crisis Operations
An Examination of Basic and Applied International Crisis Research
Statistical Findings in International Politics
Role and Perception in International Crisis
Toward a Theory of International Crisis Behavior
Opportunity” and “willingness’ as ordering concepts in the study of war
Signalling and Balancing in the Conflict in Ukraine from 2014 to 2016
Theory of Moves
Nonmyopic Equilibria in 2×2 Games
Issues in the conceptualization and measurement of events data
The theoretical approaches in the events data movement
The evolution of disputes
Linguistic Agency and Life-Span Longevity
Response to Randall Stone
Nato, Rational Escalation and Flexible Response
Affective News
From Bosnia to Sarajevo
Perceptual Illusions and Military Realities
Integrative Complexity Theory and Forecasting International Crises
Integrative Complexity and British Decisions during the Munich and Polish Crises
Integrative Complexity of Communications in International Crises
Preventing Systemic War
Field and environmental approaches to world politics
Goals in Conflict
Quantitative Methods in Foreign Policy Analysis
How to Analyze Political Attention with Minimal Assumptions and Costs
Learning and Affect i n iNternational Politics
The Credibility of Public and Private Signals
| Unique citing works | 36 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 0,59 |
| Citation span | 1965 - 2026 (62) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 24 |