Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Two Approaches To Disarmament

The Legalist and the Structuralist

Bibliographic Data

ID3916706
AuthorsJohan Galtung (International Peace Research Institute, Oslo, corresponding author)
Year1967
Volume4
Issue2
Pages161-194
Publication date1967-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Peace Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/002234336700400205
OpenAlexW2064277923
LanguageEN
Citations received2

The thesis of the paper is that disarmament thinking and particularly disarmament negotiations are governed by a legalist frame of reference patterned after domestic law, based on the ideas of establishment of a set of norms (a treaty), a detection machinery to discover deviance, an adjudication machinery concerned with verification, con viction, and sentences, a system of sanctions, and a validation system (Supreme Courts in domestic law). To the extent this kind of thinking prevails, we are unlikely ever to get disarmament, since distrustful legalists will always find loopholes in the control mechanisms. Besides, it is also probable that many control mechanisms are counter- productive and produce rather than eliminate cheating, and sanctions are almost certainly counter-productive when they are based on the principle of collective guilt in the nation breaking the treaty. Equally dangerous is the tendency that legalistically thinking negotiators will dis regard factors that may stimulate disarmament, because they cannot be accommodated within their paradigm. Such factors are the idea of morality, positive exchange and cooperation between antagonists, positive sanctions to nations that keep the treaty and not only punishment to those who do not, efforts to punish individuals rather than nations if somebody should be punished, inspection by the people of their own govern ment, unilateral steps, tacit agreements, and a dilution of the legalistically dominated environment for disarmament negotiations with people of all other kinds of background. Finally, the thesis is that legal language and legal paradigms provide the parties with a false sense of being able to communicate, when in reality what they do is to understand each other too well, so well that they disregard major possibilities and are led in the direction of major difficulties. Some models for the cooperation between legalists and structuralists are then outlined

Arms control · Disarmament · Law and economics · Negotiation · Political science · Sanctions · Sociology · Treaty · Global Peace and Security Dynamics · International Law and Human Rights · Law · Military and Defense Studies

  • The Return of GCD

    Open Access•Nicholas A Sims•Millennium Journal of International…•1971

  • Collective Goods and International Organization

    Open Access•Bruce Russett, Bruce M Russett et al.•International Organization•1971

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,04
Citation span1971 - 1971 (1)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae