Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Making useful conflict predictions

Methods for addressing skewed classes and implementing cost-sensitive learning in the study of state failure

Bibliographic Data

ID3917145
AuthorsRyan Kennedy (0000-0003-1881-6887, University of Houston, corresponding author)
Year2015
Volume52
Issue5
Pages649-664
Publication date2015-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Peace Research (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578
PublisherSAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1177/0022343315585611
OpenAlexW2193174802
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited40

One of the major issues in predicting state failure is the relatively rare occurrence of event onset. This class skew problem can cause difficulties in both estimating a model and selecting a decision boundary. Since the publication of King & Zeng's studies in 2001, scholars have utilized case-control methods to address this issue. This article builds on the landmark research of the Political Instability Task Force comparing the case-control approach to several other methods from the machine learning field and some original to this study. Case-control methods have several practical disadvantages and show no measurable advantages in prediction. The article also introduces cost-sensitive methods for determining a decision boundary. This explication raises questions about the Task Force's formulation of a decision boundary and suggests methods for making useful predictions for policy. I find that the decision boundary chosen by the PITF implicitly assumes that the cost of intervention is about 7.7% of the cost of non-intervention when state failure will take place. These findings demonstrate that there is still much work to be done in predicting state failure, especially in limiting the number of false positives. More generally, it suggests caution in using accuracy as a measure of success when significant class imbalance exists in the data

Boundary (topology) · Class (philosophy) · Data mining · Decision boundary · Event (particle physics) · Explication · False positive paradox · Machine learning · Operations research · Risk analysis (engineering) · Skew · Task (project management) · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Corruption and Economic Development · Engineering · Mathematics · Political Conflict and Governance · Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research

  • Reading Between the Lines

    Open Access•Hannes Mueller, Christoph Rauh et al.•American Political Science Review•2018

  • The shape of things to come? Expanding the inequality and grievance model for civil war forecasts with event data

    Open Access•Daina Chiba, Kristian Skrede Gleditsch•Journal of Peace Research•2017

  • Lessons from near real-time forecasting of irregular leadership changes

    Open Access•Michael D Ward, Andreas Beger•Journal of Peace Research•2017

  • Semiparametric Regression for the Social Sciences

    Open Access•Luke Keele, Luke John Keele•Semiparametric Regression for the…•2007

  • Time Series Analysis for the Social Sciences

    Open Access•J M Box-Steffensmeier, Janet Box-Steffensmeier et al.•Time Series Analysis for the…•2014

  • Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models

    Open Access•Andrew Gelman, Jennifer Hill•Data Analysis Using Regression…•2006

  • Bayesian Analysis for the Social Sciences

    Open Access•Simon Jackman•Bayesian Analysis for the Social…•2009

  • An introduction to ROC analysis

    Open Access•Tom Fawcett•Pattern Recognition Letters•2006

  • Comparing the Areas under Two or More Correlated Receiver Operating Characteristic Curves

    Elizabeth R DeLong, David M Delong et al.•Biometrics•1988

  • Neonatal, postneonatal, childhood, and under-5 mortality for 187 countries, 1970–2010

    Open Access•Julie Knoll Rajaratnam, Jake R Marcus et al.•The Lancet•2010

  • Smote

    Open Access•Nitesh V Chawla, Kevin W Bowyer et al.•Journal of Artificial Intelligence…•2002

  • Breaking the Conflict Trap: Civil War and Development Policy

    Paul Collier, V L Elliot et al.•PsycEXTRA Dataset•2003

  • Greed and grievance in civil war

    Paul Collier•Oxford Economic Papers•2004

  • Resort to War, 1816-2007

    Meredith Reid Sarkees, Meredith Sarkees et al.•Resort to war•2010

  • Crisis Early Warning and Decision Support

    Open Access•Sean O’brien, Sean P O’Brien•International Studies Review•2010

  • Improving Forecasts of State Failure

    Gary King, Langche Zeng•World Politics•2001

  • Modeling Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Survey Experiments with Bayesian Additive Regression Trees

    Donald P Green, Holger Kern et al.•Public Opinion Quarterly•2012

  • Which Elections Can Be Lost

    Open Access•Susan Hyde, Susan D Hyde et al.•Political Analysis•2012

  • Logistic Regression in Rare Events Data

    Open Access•Gary King, Langche Zeng•Political Analysis•2001

  • Competing Approaches to Predicting Supreme Court Decision Making

    A D Martins, Kevin M Quinn et al.•Perspectives on Politics•2004

  • Predicting Armed Conflict, 2010-20501

    Open Access•Håvard Hegre, Joakim Karlsen et al.•International Studies Quarterly•2013

  • Toward the Development of an Integrated Crisis Warning System

    Stephen J Andriole, Robert A Young•International Studies Quarterly•1977

  • Explaining Rare Events in International Relations

    Open Access•Gary King, Langche Zeng•International Organization•2001

  • A Political Economy of Aid

    Open Access•Bruce Bueno De Mesquita, Alastair Smith•International Organization•2009

  • Pitfalls and Prospects in the Peacekeeping Literature

    Virginia Page Fortna, Lise M Howard•Annual Review of Political Science•2008

  • Forecasting Forpolicymaking in Thepost–coldwarperiod

    Stanley A Feder•Annual Review of Political Science•2002

  • A Global Model for Forecasting Political Instability

    Open Access•Jack A Goldstone, Jack Α Goldstone et al.•American Journal of Political…•2010

  • State-Level Forecasts of the 2012 Federal and Gubernatorial Elections

    Open Access•Carl E Klarner•PS Political Science & Politics•2012

  • Analyzing Incomplete Political Science Data

    Open Access•Gary King, James Honaker et al.•American Political Science Review•2001

  • Tantalus on the Road to Asymptopia

    Open Access•Edward E Leamer•The Journal of Economic…•2010

  • Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings

    Donald T Campbell•Psychological Bulletin•1957

  • Forecasting the onset of genocide and politicide

    Open Access•Benjamin E Goldsmith, Charles Butcher et al.•Journal of Peace Research•2013

  • Forecasting is difficult, especially about the future

    Open Access•Kristian Skrede Gleditsch, Michael D Ward•Journal of Peace Research•2013

  • The perils of policy by p-value

    Open Access•Michael D Ward, Brian D Greenhill et al.•Journal of Peace Research•2010

  • Seven deadly sins of contemporary quantitative political analysis

    Open Access•Philip A Schrodt•Journal of Peace Research•2014

  • Improving Quantitative Studies of International Conflict

    Open Access•Niels Beck, Nathaniel Beck et al.•American Political Science Review•2000

  • Untangling Neural Nets

    Open Access•Scott De Marchi, Christopher Gelpi et al.•American Political Science Review•2004

Unique citing works3
Citations per year0,33
Citation span2017 - 2018 (2)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae