Do apologies promote the reintegration of former combatants? Lessons from a video experiment in Colombia
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3917792 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Gustav Agneman (0000-0003-4280-0121, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, corresponding author), Lisa Strömbom (0000-0002-8167-5856, Lund University), Angelika Rettberg (0000-0002-7777-1722, Department of Political Science, University of Los Andes, Columbia) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 62 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 928-944 |
| Publication date | 2025-07-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Peace Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00223433241261560 |
| OpenAlex | W4403806214 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 56 |
Transitional justice practices frequently involve public apologies where former combatants confess their wrongdoings and ask for forgiveness, with the underlying assumption that such displays facilitate the reintegration of ex-combatants into society. However, little is known about the public response to ex-combatant apologies. In this article, we investigate the causal effect of an armed group apology on attitudes toward ex-combatant reintegration in Colombia. Our study builds on a novel experiment implemented in Meta, a conflict-ridden department of Colombia. The experiment entailed exposing a subset of participants to a video in which a former rebel group leader apologizes for violent acts committed by their armed group during the civil war. To examine the extent to which external actors influence the effectiveness of apologies, we incorporated third-party 'encouragements to forgive' (endorsements) in two additional treatment conditions. Our analysis demonstrates that, on average, participants do not exhibit higher reintegration attitudes when exposed to the apology, regardless of third-party endorsements. However, the absence of a treatment effect is not due to an indifference to the apology. In an exploratory heterogeneity analysis, we show that the apology induces negative effects on some indicators of reintegration attitudes among participants that did not support the peace agreement. This finding aligns with qualitative data gathered in a follow-up survey, which indicates that opponents of the peace agreement generally describe negative emotional responses to the FARC-EP apology. The results call for a reconsideration of unchallenged prescriptions of public apologies after conflict
Computer security · Criminology · Injury prevention · Medical emergency · Occupational safety and health · Poison control · Political science · Suicide prevention · Applied Psychology · Computer Science · Forgiveness and Related Behaviors · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Law · Medicine · Migration, Health and Trauma · Peacebuilding and International Security · Psychology
The Social Psychology of Intergroup Reconciliation
What Happens When Groups Say Sorry
Designing Experiments That Generalize
Confirmation Bias, Ingroup Bias, and Negativity Bias in Selective Exposure to Political Information
When apologies work
Sticking with Your Vote
Why Peace Processes Fail
Colombia’s Program to Substitute Crops Used for Illegal Purposes
Peace-Making Amidst an Unfinished Social Contract
Group apology under unstable status relations
The IRA Apology of 2002 and forgiveness in Northern Ireland's troubles
Intergroup forgiveness in settings of political violence
Forgiveness in Northern Ireland
Analyzing reconciliation
How Transitional Justice Processes and Official Apologies Influence Reconciliation
Community counts
Sorry for the Genocide
Anchoring the Peace
Overcoming negative reactions to prosocial intergroup behaviors in post-conflict societies
Victim and Perpetrator Groups' Responses to the C anadian Government's Apology for the Head Tax on C hinese Immigrants and the Moderating Influence of Collective Guilt
Government Apologies for Historical Injustices
The Farc in Colombia
Forgive and Forget? Antecedents and Consequences of Intergroup Forgiveness in Bosnia and Herzegovina
How Ethnic Discrimination Shapes Political Reintegration After War
Worlds Apart
Demobilization and Reintegration
Reintegrating Rebels into Civilian Life
Forgiveness and Transitional Justice in the Czech Republic
Reconciliation in Post-Commission South Africa
Divided by the Vote
Thick recognition
Indigenous Peace-Making Versus the Liberal Peace
Reconciliation and remembering
A re-conceptualisation of ex-combatant reintegration
Guns, Camps and Cash
What drives attitudes towards the reintegration of former fighters? Insights from a conjoint experiment in Nigeria
Framing and fighting
Introducing PA-X
Examining the 'age of apology
Armed conflict and post-conflict justice, 1946-2006
Bargaining under polarization
Determinants of Reconciliation and Compromise Among Israelis and Palestinians
Peace agreement design and public support for peace
Our brothers who went to the bush
The Cultural Pragmatics of Political Apology
| Unique citing works | 2 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 2 |