The (in)effectiveness of torture for combating insurgency
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3918314 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Christopher M Sullivan (0000-0003-1755-6040, University of Michigan, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2014 |
| Volume | 51 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 388-404 |
| Publication date | 2014-05-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Peace Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0022343313520023 |
| OpenAlex | W2038651087 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 18 |
| References cited | 43 |
It is commonly believed that torture is an effective tool for combating an insurgent threat. Yet while torture is practiced in nearly all counterinsurgency campaigns, the evidence documenting torture's effects remains severely limited. This study provides the first micro-level statistical analysis of torture's relation to subsequent killings committed by insurgent and counterinsurgent forces. The theoretical arguments contend that torture is ineffective for reducing killings perpetrated by insurgents both because it fails to reduce insurgent capacities for violence and because it can increase the incentives for insurgents to commit future killings. The theory also links torture to other forms of state violence. Specifically, engaging in torture is expected to be associated with increased killings perpetrated by counterinsurgents. Monthly municipal-level data on political violence are used to analyze torture committed by counterinsurgents during the Guatemalan civil war (1977-94). Using a matched-sample, difference-in-difference identification strategy and data compiled from 22 different press and NGO sources as well as thousands of interviews, the study estimates how torture is related to short-term changes in killings perpetrated by both insurgents and counterinsurgents. Killings by counterinsurgents are shown to increase significantly following torture. However, torture appears to have no robust correlation with subsequent killings by insurgents. Based on this evidence the study concludes that torture is ineffective for reducing insurgent perpetrated killings
Computer security · Criminology · Economics · Environmental health · Human rights · Incentive · Insurgency · Poison control · Political science · Politics · Torture · Computer Science · Gender, Security, and Conflict · Law · Medicine · Migration, Health and Trauma · Political Conflict and Governance · Psychology
The Rebel Alliance Strikes Back
Humanitarian Concerns and Acceptance of Syrian Refugees in Turkey
Introducing DyoRep
From Barriers to Abuse
The interrogation game
Political Repression and the Destruction of Dissident Organizations
Doing Harm by Doing Good? The Negative Externalities of Humanitarian Aid Provision during Civil Conflict
Undermining Resistance
Dirty Hands
The Consequences of Contention
The Physical Consequences of Fiscal Flexibility
Repression as a Double‐edged Sword
Can Rights Discourse Diminish Support for Displaced Persons
The socialization of civilians and militia members
New findings from conflict archives
Ideology and state terror
The Logic of Kidnapping in Civil War
Counterinsurgency Tactics, Rebel Grievances, and Who Keeps Fighting
Spatial Regression Models
Insurgent Collective Action and Civil War in El Salvador
Multivariate and Propensity Score Matching Software with Automated Balance Optimization
Misunderstandings Between Experimentalists and Observationalists about Causal Inference
Repression And Mobilization
Convention against Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment
Torture and Democracy
Freedom Summer
The Guatemalan Military Project
Torture
Mostly Harmless Econometrics
The Cingranelli and Richards (Ciri) Human Rights Data Project
The Logic of Violence in Civil War
Genetic Matching for Estimating Causal Effects
Estimating the Effect of Training Programs on Earnings
The human capital consequences of civil war
Counterinsurgency Warfare
Dangerous Liaisons
Why terrorism works
Why Big Nations Lose Small Wars
How “Free” is Free Riding in Civil Wars
Treaties, Tenure, and Torture
Estimating the Effects of Human Rights Treaties on State Behavior
Matching as Nonparametric Preprocessing for Reducing Model Dependence in Parametric Causal Inference
Repression, Backfire, and The Theory of Transformative Events
Views to a Kill
The “Game” of Torture
Does Indiscriminate Violence Incite Insurgent Attacks
Domestic Judicial Institutions and Human Rights Treaty Violation
Who Takes the Blame? The Strategic Effects of Collateral Damage
Exploiting a Rare Communication Shift to Document the Persuasive Power of the News Media
What Stops the Torture
Aerial Bombing and Counterinsurgency in the Vietnam War
Tortured Relations
State Repression and Political Order
Micro-Level Studies of Violence in Civil War
Respect for Human Rights after the End of the Cold War
Are Coethnics More Effective Counterinsurgents? Evidence from the Second Chechen War
Explaining Support for Combatants during Wartime
| Unique citing works | 18 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,64 |
| Citation span | 2015 - 2026 (12) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 17 |