Butterfly effects in global trade
International borders, disputes, and trade disruption and diversion
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3918520 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Ryan Brutger (0000-0001-6407-8980, Travers Department of Political Science, University of California, corresponding author), Tim Marple (0000-0001-5047-6689, Google Trust & Safety) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 903-916 |
| Publication date | 2024-11-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Peace Research (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0022-3433 • E-ISSN: 1460-3578 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications Inc (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1177/00223433231180928 |
| OpenAlex | W4387021585 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 46 |
This article theorizes and tests how different types of interstate conflict across borders affect trade between disputing parties and trade diversion with third parties. Building on theories of borders as institutions, we differentiate the effects of two types of international disputes - border disputes and escalated militarized disputes - and draw on 60 years of trade and conflict data to test the effects of these disputes on bilateral and third-party trade flows. We find that border disputes and militarized disputes each depress trade flows between the disputing countries. However, legal border disputes are associated with increased trade diversion with non-disputing countries, which may fully offset the forgone bilateral trade, whereas militarized disputes have the opposite effect. These results show that actors engaged in trade can offset bilateral trade losses from a border dispute by expanding trade with third parties not involved in the dispute, but the same cannot be said of offsetting the losses from militarized disputes. The fact that border disputes and militarized disputes have opposite effects on trade diversion highlights the importance of examining both the type of dispute and the type of trade flows that are affected when studying conflict and trade and evaluating the potentially pacifying incentives of international trade
Bilateral trade · Economics · Incentive · International economics · International trade · Market economy · Offset (computer science) · Political science · Trade barrier · Global trade and economics · International Development and Aid · Law · Political Conflict and Governance
International Military Alliances, 1648-2008
The Political Economy of International Relations
The Gravity Model
Standing Your Ground
The Correlates of War (Cow) Project Direct Contiguity Data, Version 3.0
Reduced ‘Border effects’, Free Trade Agreements and international trade
The Dyadic Militarized Interstate Disputes (MIDs) Dataset Version 3.0
Collateral Damage
Peace data
Trading Data
Does third-party trade reduce conflict? Credible signaling versus opportunity costs
Borders, ethnicity and trade
Wartime Commercial Policy and Trade between Enemies
Business as Usual? Economic Responses to Political Tensions
International Trade and Coordination
Multilateral Trade and Militarized Conflict
War and Third-party Trade
The Impact of Trade on International Mediation
Mapping Interstate Territorial Conflict
Foreign Direct Investment and Territorial Disputes
Trade and Foreign Policy Attitudes
Rules over Real Estate
When Do Conflicting Political Relations Affect International Trade
The (Ir)Relevance of Militarized Interstate Disputes for International Trade
International Law, Territorial Disputes, and Foreign Direct Investment
Barriers to Trade
Trade Blocs, Trade Flows, and International Conflict
Institutions in International Relations
Politics, Institutions, and Trade
Borders, Conflict, and Trade
Conflict, Cooperation, and Commerce
International Trade, Political Conflict/Cooperation, and Granger Causality
Commerce and Conflict
The Gravity Model
Sleeping with the Enemy
How Could Trade Affect Conflict
Trade does promote peace
The Impact of War on Trade
Does International Law Promote the Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes? Evidence from the Study of Territorial Conflicts since 1945
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 5 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2026 (2) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |