Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Who supports gender quotas for company leadership? An empirical analysis of determinants of support and rejection among German citizens

Bibliographic Data

ID3940786
AuthorsK Mohring (0000-0002-3742-5374), Céline Teney (0000-0001-6359-5361), Christopher Bu, Christopher Buß
Year2019
Volume70
Issue2
Pages121-143
Publication date2019-01-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSoziale Welt (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0038-6073
PublisherNomos Verlag (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.5771/0038-6073-2019-2-121
OpenAlexW2995009692
LanguageEN
Citations received3

After a long and controversial debate, a statutory gender boardroom quota was introduced in Germany in 2016. We examine the determinants of support for this quota among citizens aiming to identify the social groups that approve the most and those that resent the most the quota law. The approaches of self-interest, political orientation, and exposure are used to understand variation in support from a theoretical perspective. Based on data from the German Internet Panel (GIP) surveyed in March 2017 (N=2544), individual-level and workplace-related determinants of support for the boardroom quota are analysed. Our results show a general gender gap in support for a quota with greater support among women, but reveal differences within the target group of women and within the non-target group of men. These differences demonstrate that the interplay of gender and position on the labour market is pivotal for attitudes towards affirmative action in favour of women. The quota is most supported by single women in upper management positions, while most opposed by married women and young men. This leads to the conclusion that opposition to the gender quota is greatest among those who are disregarded by the regulation or might see their prospective labour market chances to be threatened

Business · Demographic economics · Economics · Empirical research · German · Opposition (politics · Political science · Politics · Statutory law · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Law · Political Influence and Corporate Strategies

  • Who supports whom? Citizens’ support for affirmative action policies in recruitment processes towards four underrepresented groups

    Céline Teney, Giuseppe Pietrantuono et al.•Journal of European Public Policy•2023

  • Widespread, but also popular? Exploring attitudes to diversity policies

    Open Access•Nicolas Flie, Karen Schönwälder•European Political Science Review•2025

  • Doing diversity? Analyzing support for diversity policies with a conjoint experiment

    Open Access•Katharina Stückradt, Bram Lancee et al.•Social Science Research•2026

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae