"The creation of "monsters
The discourse of opposition to in vitro fertilization in Poland
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3972180 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Magdalena Radkowska-Walkowicz (0000-0002-4127-9592, University of Warsaw, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 20 |
| Issue | 40 |
| Pages | 30-37 |
| Publication date | 2012-03-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Reproductive Health Matters (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0968-8080 • E-ISSN: 1460-9576 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1016/s0968-8080(12)40647-4 |
| PMID | 23245406 |
| OpenAlex | W2055512251 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 23 |
| References cited | 16 |
In Poland, there is a campaign to criminalise in vitro fertilization, led by the Catholic church. This article explores how this campaign makes “monsters” of IVF children in its discourse, that is, embodiments of “the other” in the sense of Frankenstein's monster. Basing the analysis primarily on Catholic mass media publications, the article investigates the discursive strategies employed to oppose IVF, most notably by the Catholic clergy and activists and journalists associated with the Church. They attribute “monstrosity” to the children in the following ways: physical (possible bodily deformity), psychological (survivor syndrome, identity crisis), social (loneliness, uncertain place in family relations), and ethical (a life burdened with the deaths of many embryos). Although the world of families with IVF does not provide examples of children who could be considered monsters in any of these terms, these arguments have become the primary reasons given for banning IVF.RésuméEn Pologne, une campagne dirigée par l'Église catholique cherche à criminaliser la fécondation in vitro. Cet article analyse comment, dans son discours, cette campagne transforme les enfants de la FIV en « monstres », c'est-à-dire en incarnation de « l'autre » au sens du monstre de Frankenstein. Se fondant principalement sur les publications des médias catholiques, l'article enquête sur les stratégies discursives utilisées pour s'opposer à la FIV, notamment par le clergé et les militants catholiques ainsi que les journalistes associés avec l'Église. Ils classent la « monstruosité » des enfants de la manière suivante : physique (possible difformité physique), psychologique (syndrome du survivant, crise d'identité), sociale (solitude, place incertaine dans les liens familiaux) et éthique (une vie grevée par le décès de nombreux embryons). Bien que les familles ayant eu recours à la FIV ne fournissent pas d'exemples d'enfants pouvant être considérés comme des monstres dans aucun de ces sens, ces arguments sont devenus les principaux motifs d'interdiction de la FIV.ResumenEn Polonia, existe una campaña para penalizar la fertilización in vitro, dirigida por la Iglesia católica. En este artículo se explora cómo esta campaña crea “monstruos” de los niños productos de FIV en su discurso, es decir, encarnación de “lo otro” en el sentido del monstruo de Frankenstein. Basando el análisis principalmente en publicaciones de los medios masivos católicos, el artículo investiga las estrategias discursivas empleadas para oponerse a la FIV, en particular el clero católico y activistas y periodistas asociados con la Iglesia. Atribuyen la “monstruosidad” a los niños de las siguientes maneras: física (posible deformidad corporal), psicológica (síndrome de sobreviviente, crisis de identidad), social (soledad, lugar inestable en las relaciones familiares) y ética (una vida cargada con la muerte de muchos embriones). Aunque el mundo de las familias con FIV no ofrece ejemplos de niños que se podrían considerar como monstruos en cualquiera de estos términos, estos argumentos han pasado a ser las principales razones planteadas a favor de la prohibición de la FIV
Art · Art history · Ethnology · Humanities · Loneliness · Monster · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences · Historical Studies on Reproduction, Gender, Health, and Societal Changes · Law · Psychology · Reproductive Health and Technologies · Social Psychology
Intimate Strangers
Attitudes of Major Religious Organizations in Ukraine to Abortion and Reproductive Medicine
Typy legitymizacji w wypowiedziach hierarchów Kościoła rzymskokatolickiego w Polsce na temat gender i praw reprodukcyjnych
Religion on Catholic Internet Forums in Poland. A Memory Mediated
Silent Subject
Jak zaczęła się twoja historia”. Nowe technologie reprodukcyjne i nowe formy stygmatyzacji
Comparison of Early-Stage Mothers and Childless Women Seeking Pregnancy
The purest citizens’ and ‘IVF children’. Reproductive citizenship in contemporary Poland
I was with my wife the entire time.’ Polish men’s narratives of IVF treatment
Women on strike
Frozen children and despairing embryos in the ‘new’ post-communist state
How the Political Becomes Private
Unravelling orders in a borderless Europe? Cross-border reproductive care and the paradoxes of assisted reproductive technology policy in Germany and Poland
Reproducing politics
Do ‘ in vitro children’ exist? The ‘ontological choreography’ between public debates and private experiences in Poland
Between Advanced Medical Technology and Prayer
The Persistence of the Frankenstein Myth
Differentiation of religiosity and its effects on biopolitical orientations among Catholics
Should I Buy Her a Doll'? Motherhood and Turner Syndrome in Poland
Between a Rock and a Hard Place
Tactile Crease
Terms of Engagement
Reproductive Governance and the (Re)definition of Human Rights in Poland
Purity and Danger
Infertility around the Globe
Nationalist discourse and the ultra-conservative press in contemporary Poland
The Monster in the Machine
Purity and Danger
Stigmatisation and commercialisation of abortion services in Poland
Neoliberal reforms and privatisation of reproductive health services in post-socialist Poland
| Unique citing works | 23 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 1,92 |
| Citation span | 2014 - 2023 (10) |
| Citation velocity | historical |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 17 |