Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Distributional properties of an agreement marker in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS)

Bibliographic Data

ID3989057
AuthorsJ Krebs (0000-0003-4990-4142, University of Salzburg, corresponding author), Ronnie B Wilbur (Department of Linguistics, and Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2122, USA), Ronnie Β Wilbur (0000-0001-7081-9351, Purdue University West Lafayette), Dietmar Roehm (0000-0002-2370-4348, University of Salzburg)
Year2020
Volume58
Issue4
Pages1151-1194
Publication date2020-10-25
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLinguistics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0024-3949 • E-ISSN: 1613-396X
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1515/ling-2020-0159
OpenAlexW3087737778
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited26

This study focuses on the distribution ofagrm-bc, one of two agreement markers used in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS; Krebs, Julia, Ronnie B. Wilbur & Dietmar Roehm. 2017. Two agreement markers in ÖGS.Sign Language and Linguistics20(1). 27-54), with respect to different "verb types". Using an online questionnaire, ÖGS signers rated ÖGS sentences involving different verb types that varied in whether they show agreement with their arguments ("agreeing" with two arguments, "plain" with none or only one) and if so, how (movement from subject to object, backwards from object to subject and/or facing towards object). Thus, the verbs differ in the degree and form of expressing agreement. In addition, these verbs either appeared with or withoutagrm-bc. Data analysis revealed that the combination of inflected agreeing verbs and the agreement marker ("double agreement") is acceptable in ÖGS. If the verb itself does not indicate full agreement (i.e., as in plain verbs)agrm-bccan, but does not have to, be used to indicate the argument structure. Independently, whether the verb showed full agreement marking (movement and facing) or only facing did not influence the acceptability of the occurrence ofagrm-bc. The relatively high ratings for the combination ofagrm-bcwith different verb types suggests thatagrm-bcfunctions as a general agreement marker in ÖGS

Agreement · Argument (complex analysis) · Linguistics · Object (grammar) · Sign (mathematics) · Sign language · Subject (documents) · Verb · Chemistry · Computer Science · Hearing Impairment and Communication · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · linguistics and terminology studies · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology

  • Differential Object Marking in DGS (German Sign Language)

    Open Access•Thiago de Souza Santos, Antonia Dietrich et al.•Glossa a journal of general…•2025

  • Word order in the context of extensional and intensional events in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS)

    Open Access•J Krebs, Ronnie Β Wilbur•Glossa a journal of general…•2024

  • Cross-linguistic comparison of agreement verbs in sign languages, their inventory sizes and motivation for verb class affiliation

    Kevin Behrens•Language Typology and Universals•2025

  • Testing the Event Visibility Hypothesis in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS)

    Open Access•J Krebs, Ronnie Β Wilbur et al.•Language and Cognition•2026

  • How animacy impacts word order in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS)

    Open Access•J Krebs•Lingua•2025

  • The interaction of syntax, non-manuals, and prosodic cues as potential topic markers in Austrian Sign Language

    Open Access•J Krebs, Ronnie Β Wilbur et al.•Sign Language & Linguistics•2025

  • Gesture, sign, and language

    Open Access•Susan Goldin-Meadow, D Brentari•Behavioral and Brain Sciences•2017

  • Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing

    Open Access•Dale J Barr, Roger Levy et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2013

  • Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4

    Open Access•David M Bates, Douglas Bates et al.•Journal of Statistical Software•2015

  • Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items

    Open Access•R Harald Baayen, D J Davidson et al.•Journal of Memory and Language•2008

  • What do agreement auxiliaries reveal about the grammar of sign language agreement

    Marilyn Steinbach, Markus Steinbach•Theoretical Linguistics•2011

  • On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign languages

    Diane Lillo-Martin, Richard P Meier•Theoretical Linguistics•2011

  • The Relationship between Eye Gaze and Verb Agreement in American Sign Language

    Open Access•Robin Thompson, Robin L Thompson et al.•Natural Language and Linguistic…•2006

  • The Impact of Transitional Movements and Non-Manual Markings on the Disambiguation of Locally Ambiguous Argument Structures in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS)

    Open Access•J Krebs, Ronnie B Wilbur et al.•Language and Speech•2019

  • Effects of Varying Rate of Signing on ASL Manual Signs and Nonmanual Markers

    Open Access•Ronnie B Wilbur, Ronnie Β Wilbur•Language and Speech•2009

  • Grammaticalization and modality

    Open Access•Irit Meir•Journal of Linguistics•2003

  • Body as subject

    Open Access•Irit Meir, Carol Padden et al.•Journal of Linguistics•2007

  • The role of agreement and auxiliaries in sign language

    Open Access•Susan D Fischer•Lingua•1996

  • Foregrounding structures in American sign language

    Open Access•Ronnie B Wilbur, Ronnie Β Wilbur•Journal of Pragmatics•1994

  • Modification of indicating verbs in British Sign Language

    Open Access•Jordan Fenlon, Adam Schembri et al.•Language•2018

Unique citing works6
Citations per year3
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 6

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae