Distributional properties of an agreement marker in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS)
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 3989057 |
|---|---|
| Authors | J Krebs (0000-0003-4990-4142, University of Salzburg, corresponding author), Ronnie B Wilbur (Department of Linguistics, and Department of Speech, Language, and Hearing Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907-2122, USA), Ronnie Β Wilbur (0000-0001-7081-9351, Purdue University West Lafayette), Dietmar Roehm (0000-0002-2370-4348, University of Salzburg) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 58 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 1151-1194 |
| Publication date | 2020-10-25 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Linguistics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0024-3949 • E-ISSN: 1613-396X |
| Publisher | Walter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE) |
| DOI | 10.1515/ling-2020-0159 |
| OpenAlex | W3087737778 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 6 |
| References cited | 26 |
This study focuses on the distribution ofagrm-bc, one of two agreement markers used in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS; Krebs, Julia, Ronnie B. Wilbur & Dietmar Roehm. 2017. Two agreement markers in ÖGS.Sign Language and Linguistics20(1). 27-54), with respect to different "verb types". Using an online questionnaire, ÖGS signers rated ÖGS sentences involving different verb types that varied in whether they show agreement with their arguments ("agreeing" with two arguments, "plain" with none or only one) and if so, how (movement from subject to object, backwards from object to subject and/or facing towards object). Thus, the verbs differ in the degree and form of expressing agreement. In addition, these verbs either appeared with or withoutagrm-bc. Data analysis revealed that the combination of inflected agreeing verbs and the agreement marker ("double agreement") is acceptable in ÖGS. If the verb itself does not indicate full agreement (i.e., as in plain verbs)agrm-bccan, but does not have to, be used to indicate the argument structure. Independently, whether the verb showed full agreement marking (movement and facing) or only facing did not influence the acceptability of the occurrence ofagrm-bc. The relatively high ratings for the combination ofagrm-bcwith different verb types suggests thatagrm-bcfunctions as a general agreement marker in ÖGS
Agreement · Argument (complex analysis) · Linguistics · Object (grammar) · Sign (mathematics) · Sign language · Subject (documents) · Verb · Chemistry · Computer Science · Hearing Impairment and Communication · Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies · linguistics and terminology studies · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology
Differential Object Marking in DGS (German Sign Language)
Word order in the context of extensional and intensional events in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS)
Cross-linguistic comparison of agreement verbs in sign languages, their inventory sizes and motivation for verb class affiliation
Testing the Event Visibility Hypothesis in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS)
How animacy impacts word order in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS)
The interaction of syntax, non-manuals, and prosodic cues as potential topic markers in Austrian Sign Language
Gesture, sign, and language
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items
What do agreement auxiliaries reveal about the grammar of sign language agreement
On the linguistic status of ‘agreement’ in sign languages
The Relationship between Eye Gaze and Verb Agreement in American Sign Language
The Impact of Transitional Movements and Non-Manual Markings on the Disambiguation of Locally Ambiguous Argument Structures in Austrian Sign Language (ÖGS)
Effects of Varying Rate of Signing on ASL Manual Signs and Nonmanual Markers
Grammaticalization and modality
Body as subject
The role of agreement and auxiliaries in sign language
Foregrounding structures in American sign language
Modification of indicating verbs in British Sign Language
| Unique citing works | 6 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |