Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Psychology, progress, and the problem of reflexivity

A study in the epistemological foundations of psychology

Bibliographic Data

ID4001986
AuthorsOwen Flanagan (0000-0001-5658-8083, Wellesley College, corresponding author), Owen J Flanagan
Year1981
Volume17
Issue3
Pages375-386
Publication date1981-07-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0022-5061 • E-ISSN: 1520-6696
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/1520-6696(198107)17:3<375::aid-jhbs2300170308>3.0.co;2-u
PMID11610901
OpenAlexW2154294473
LanguageEN
Citations received15

Buss's thesis that, throughout the history of psychology, psychological theories have alternated between two contradictory models of human nature is examined and supported. One model sees humans as actively constructing themselves; the other model sees humans as constructed from the outside. The thesis that the inherent reflexive quality of psychological inquiry is the cause of this alternation is then examined. Three different hypotheses as to how “reflexivity” might explain this alternation are offered. Finally, brief attention is given to the question of whether psychology can be seen as progressing if it is as philosophically indecisive as the analysis suggests.

Alternation (linguistics) · Cognitive psychology · Epistemology · Psychological research · Quality (philosophy) · Reflexivity · Social science · Sociology · Theoretical psychology · Academic and Historical Perspectives in Psychology · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology · Social Representations and Identity

  • Envisioning Journalism Practice as Research

    Sarah Niblock•Journalism Practice•2012

  • Just One more `Other' in Psychology

    Open Access•Jill G Morawski•Theory & Psychology•2000

  • Wittgenstein’s later philosophy and “pictures” of mixed-method research in psychology

    Open Access•Gavin B Sullivan•Theory & Psychology•2015

  • Does reflexivity separate the human sciences from the natural sciences

    Open Access•Roger Smith•History of the Human Sciences•2005

  • Reflexivity and the psychologist

    Open Access•Jill G Morawski•History of the Human Sciences•2005

  • A Restive Legacy

    Open Access•Jill G Morawski, Gail Agronick•Psychology of Women Quarterly•1991

  • A framework of ‘doctorateness’ for the social sciences and postgraduate researchers’ perceptions of key attributes of an excellent PhD thesis

    Glauco De Vita, Jason Begley•Studies in Higher Education•2024

  • Naturalistic research and ecological thinking in the study of child development

    Open Access•Jaan Valsiner, Laura Benigni•Developmental Review•1986

  • Self-Regard and Other-Regard

    Open Access•Jill G Morawski•Science in Context•1992

  • The measurement of masculinity and femininity

    Open Access•Jill G Morawski•Journal of Personality•1985

  • The Phenomenology of Emotion as a Pathway for Actualizing the Humanistic Revolution in Psychology

    Open Access•Eugene M Derobertis•Journal of Humanistic Psychology•2026

  • Active and Passive Conceptions of the Television Audience

    Open Access•Greg Hearn•Human Relations•1989

  • Clinical Inquiry as Scientific Training

    Open Access•Lisa L Tsoi Hoshmand•The Counseling Psychologist•1991

  • Alternate Research Paradigms

    Open Access•Lisa L S Tsoi Hoshmand•The Counseling Psychologist•1989

  • Hegemony and the Central Asian Paleolithic Record

    Open Access•Michelle M Glantz•Evaluating Evidence in Biological…•2019

Unique citing works15
Citations per year0,37
Citation span1985 - 2026 (42)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 14

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae